Jamila Perritt

757 total citations
26 papers, 463 citations indexed

About

Jamila Perritt is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jamila Perritt has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 463 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 15 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 14 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Jamila Perritt's work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (21 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (14 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (7 papers). Jamila Perritt is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Contraception (21 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (14 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (7 papers). Jamila Perritt collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Jamila Perritt's co-authors include Daniel Grossman, Carolyn Sufrin, Elizabeth G. Raymond, Alice Mark, Ushma D. Upadhyay, Mitchell D. Creinin, Rachel R. Hardeman, Leah Coplon, Marji Gold and Andrea V. Jackson and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Jamila Perritt

25 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jamila Perritt United States 12 334 203 202 90 86 26 463
Joanna N. Erdman Canada 14 291 0.9× 230 1.1× 174 0.9× 104 1.2× 90 1.0× 36 464
Kate Coleman‐Minahan United States 12 389 1.2× 241 1.2× 158 0.8× 130 1.4× 98 1.1× 45 577
Rana Barar United States 11 417 1.2× 178 0.9× 174 0.9× 178 2.0× 56 0.7× 16 489
Carrie Purcell United Kingdom 13 293 0.9× 95 0.5× 124 0.6× 125 1.4× 77 0.9× 26 433
Shelly Kaller United States 12 345 1.0× 163 0.8× 143 0.7× 114 1.3× 32 0.4× 45 482
Stephanie Arteaga United States 10 237 0.7× 130 0.6× 126 0.6× 75 0.8× 34 0.4× 24 351
Alice F. Cartwright United States 11 302 0.9× 148 0.7× 131 0.6× 122 1.4× 33 0.4× 33 401
Jennet Arcara United States 10 169 0.5× 108 0.5× 94 0.5× 45 0.5× 56 0.7× 26 311
Kristen M. Shellenberg United States 7 340 1.0× 165 0.8× 73 0.4× 122 1.4× 49 0.6× 10 390
Marlene Makenzius Sweden 13 264 0.8× 198 1.0× 76 0.4× 42 0.5× 40 0.5× 31 387

Countries citing papers authored by Jamila Perritt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jamila Perritt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamila Perritt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamila Perritt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jamila Perritt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamila Perritt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamila Perritt. The network helps show where Jamila Perritt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jamila Perritt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jamila Perritt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jamila Perritt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jamila Perritt. Jamila Perritt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Biggs, M. Antonia, Lauren Ralph, Shelly Kaller, et al.. (2025). No-Test Screening Protocols May Disproportionately Exclude Structurally Oppressed Communities Who Could Benefit from Accessing Medication Abortion. Health Equity. 9(1). 189–200.
2.
Biggs, M. Antonia, et al.. (2025). Accuracy of survey-based assessment of eligibility for medication abortion compared with clinician assessment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 233(1). 44.e1–44.e15. 1 indexed citations
3.
Dehlendorf, Christine, et al.. (2024). Meeting people’s pregnancy prevention needs: Let’s not force people to state an “Intention”. Contraception. 135. 110400–110400. 6 indexed citations
4.
Jain, Divya, et al.. (2023). The Provision of Medication Abortion Care via Telehealth. Women s Health Issues. 33(4). 333–336. 1 indexed citations
5.
Raymond, Elizabeth G., Alice Mark, Daniel Grossman, et al.. (2023). Medication abortion with misoprostol-only: A sample protocol. Contraception. 121. 109998–109998. 11 indexed citations
6.
Biggs, M. Antonia, Kelly Blanchard, Nathalie Kapp, et al.. (2022). Comprehension of an Over-the-Counter Drug Facts Label Prototype for a Mifepristone and Misoprostol Medication Abortion Product. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 139(6). 1111–1122. 11 indexed citations
7.
Ralph, Lauren, Rana Barar, M. Antonia Biggs, et al.. (2022). Accuracy of Self-Assessment of Gestational Duration Among People Seeking Abortion. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 77(8). 473–475. 1 indexed citations
8.
Biggs, M. Antonia, Lauren Ralph, Jamila Perritt, et al.. (2022). A cross-sectional survey of U.S. abortion patients’ interest in obtaining medication abortion over the counter. Contraception. 109. 25–31. 4 indexed citations
9.
Moniz, Michelle H., et al.. (2022). Balancing enhanced contraceptive access with risk of reproductive injustice: A United States comparative case study. Contraception. 113. 88–94. 12 indexed citations
10.
Dehlendorf, Christine & Jamila Perritt. (2022). Statewide Contraceptive Access Initiatives: A Critical Perspective. American Journal of Public Health. 112(S5). S490–S493. 8 indexed citations
11.
Mark, Alice, Angel M. Foster, & Jamila Perritt. (2021). The future of abortion is now: Mifepristone by mail and in-clinic abortion access in the United States. Contraception. 104(1). 38–42. 5 indexed citations
12.
Ralph, Lauren, Rana Barar, M. Antonia Biggs, et al.. (2021). Accuracy of self-assessment of gestational duration among people seeking abortion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 226(5). 710.e1–710.e21. 26 indexed citations
13.
Williams, Caitlin R., et al.. (2021). Reimagining Perinatal Mental Health: An Expansive Vision For Structural Change. Health Affairs. 40(10). 1592–1596. 20 indexed citations
14.
Raymond, Elizabeth G., Daniel Grossman, Alice Mark, et al.. (2020). Commentary: No-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond. Contraception. 101(6). 361–366. 119 indexed citations
15.
Perritt, Jamila. (2020). #WhiteCoatsForBlackLives — Addressing Physicians’ Complicity in Criminalizing Communities. New England Journal of Medicine. 383(19). 1804–1806. 20 indexed citations
16.
Perritt, Jamila, et al.. (2020). Community-informed models of perinatal and reproductive health services provision: A justice-centered paradigm toward equity among Black birthing communities. Seminars in Perinatology. 44(5). 151267–151267. 74 indexed citations
17.
18.
Perritt, Jamila, Anne E. Burke, & Alison Edelman. (2013). RETIRED: Interruption of nonviable pregnancies of 24–28 weeks' gestation using medical methods. Contraception. 88(3). 341–349. 12 indexed citations
19.
20.
Perritt, Jamila, Alison Edelman, & Anne E. Burke. (2011). Controversies in family planning: management of lethal fetal anomalies in the third trimester. Contraception. 86(2). 93–95. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joanna N. Erdman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kate Coleman‐Minahan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rana Barar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carrie Purcell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shelly Kaller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephanie Arteaga Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alice F. Cartwright Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennet Arcara Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kristen M. Shellenberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marlene Makenzius
Rankless by CCL
2026