J. Hassinger

575 total citations
21 papers, 439 citations indexed

About

J. Hassinger is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Hassinger has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 439 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in J. Hassinger's work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (14 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers). J. Hassinger is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Contraception (14 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers). J. Hassinger collaborates with scholars based in United States. J. Hassinger's co-authors include Lisa Martin, Lisa H. Harris, Michelle P. Debbink, Emily J. Youatt, Lina María Echeverri, Peter Donkor, Janet Kwansah, Frank W. Anderson, Cheryl A. Moyer and Sarah Rominski and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Academic Medicine and Qualitative Health Research.

In The Last Decade

J. Hassinger

21 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Hassinger United States 9 376 151 139 136 121 21 439
Shelly Kaller United States 12 345 0.9× 114 0.8× 143 1.0× 163 1.2× 161 1.3× 45 482
Carrie Purcell United Kingdom 13 293 0.8× 125 0.8× 124 0.9× 95 0.7× 109 0.9× 26 433
Rana Barar United States 11 417 1.1× 178 1.2× 174 1.3× 178 1.3× 101 0.8× 16 489
Elizabeth Janiak United States 14 357 0.9× 190 1.3× 156 1.1× 144 1.1× 96 0.8× 62 484
Kristen M. Shellenberg United States 7 340 0.9× 122 0.8× 73 0.5× 165 1.2× 164 1.4× 10 390
Kate Cockrill United States 11 507 1.3× 234 1.5× 135 1.0× 135 1.0× 194 1.6× 17 596
Alice F. Cartwright United States 11 302 0.8× 122 0.8× 131 0.9× 148 1.1× 89 0.7× 33 401
Brianna Keefe‐Oates United States 9 317 0.8× 135 0.9× 123 0.9× 150 1.1× 64 0.5× 19 348
Kate Coleman‐Minahan United States 12 389 1.0× 130 0.9× 158 1.1× 241 1.8× 179 1.5× 45 577
Uta Landy United States 15 554 1.5× 240 1.6× 337 2.4× 214 1.6× 92 0.8× 44 620

Countries citing papers authored by J. Hassinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Hassinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Hassinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Hassinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Hassinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Hassinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Hassinger. The network helps show where J. Hassinger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Hassinger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Hassinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Hassinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Hassinger. J. Hassinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hassinger, J., et al.. (2021). The child in the school, the school in the community, and the community in the child: Linking psychic and social domains in school violence prevention. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies. 18(3). 330–341. 3 indexed citations
2.
Martin, Lisa, et al.. (2019). Stigma and abortion complications: stories from three continents. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters. 27(3). 75–85. 16 indexed citations
3.
Martin, Lisa, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of Abortion Stigma in the Workforce: Development of the Revised Abortion Providers Stigma Scale. Women s Health Issues. 28(1). 59–67. 21 indexed citations
4.
Debbink, Michelle P., et al.. (2016). Experiences With the Providers Share Workshop Method. Qualitative Health Research. 26(13). 1823–1837. 20 indexed citations
5.
Bennett, Allison K., J. Hassinger, Lisa Martin, Lisa H. Harris, & Marji Gold. (2015). Developing patient-centered teams: The role of sharing stories about patients and patient care.. Families Systems & Health. 33(3). 203–212. 8 indexed citations
6.
Anderson, Frank W., Peter Donkor, Raymond De Vries, et al.. (2014). Creating a Charter of Collaboration for International University Partnerships. Academic Medicine. 89(8). 1125–1132. 21 indexed citations
7.
Martin, Lisa, Michelle P. Debbink, J. Hassinger, Emily J. Youatt, & Lisa H. Harris. (2014). Abortion providers, stigma and professional quality of life. Contraception. 90(6). 581–587. 69 indexed citations
8.
Martin, Lisa, et al.. (2014). Measuring Stigma Among Abortion Providers: Assessing the Abortion Provider Stigma Survey Instrument. Women & Health. 54(7). 641–661. 41 indexed citations
9.
Hassinger, J.. (2014). Twenty-first-century living color: Racialized enactment in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis Culture & Society. 19(4). 337–359. 4 indexed citations
10.
Harris, Lisa H., et al.. (2013). Michigan’s HB5711: a case study of the role of abortion provider stigma in anti-abortion legislation. Contraception. 88(3). 443–443. 3 indexed citations
11.
Hassinger, J., et al.. (2013). “I actually like children very much”: The false dichotomization of abortion provision and motherhood. Contraception. 88(3). 443–443. 2 indexed citations
12.
Debbink, Michelle P., et al.. (2013). Why women are dying from unsafe abortion: narratives of Ghanaian abortion providers.. PubMed. 17(2). 118–28. 37 indexed citations
13.
Martin, Lisa, et al.. (2013). Abortion providers as stigmatizers: provider judgment and stereotyping of patients seeking abortion. Contraception. 88(3). 443–443. 3 indexed citations
14.
Harris, Lisa H., Lisa Martin, Michelle P. Debbink, & J. Hassinger. (2012). Physicians, abortion provision and the legitimacy paradox. Contraception. 87(1). 11–16. 63 indexed citations
15.
Harris, Lisa H., et al.. (2012). Dangerous talk among abortion providers. Contraception. 86(3). 302–302. 1 indexed citations
16.
Martin, Lisa, et al.. (2012). Measurement of stigma in abortion provision: the abortion provider stigma scale. Contraception. 86(3). 302–303. 1 indexed citations
17.
Martin, Lisa, Michelle P. Debbink, J. Hassinger, & Lisa H. Harris. (2011). Abortion-Possible and Impossible: Stigma and the Narratives of Ghanaian Doctors Who Provide Abortions. 17(3). 79–87. 4 indexed citations
18.
Harris, Lisa H., Michelle P. Debbink, Lisa Martin, & J. Hassinger. (2011). Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: Findings from a pilot study of the Providers Share Workshop. Social Science & Medicine. 73(7). 1062–1070. 115 indexed citations
19.
Martin, Lisa, et al.. (2011). Psychometric evaluation of a new measure of abortion stigma. Contraception. 84(3). 312–312. 1 indexed citations
20.
Debbink, Michelle P., et al.. (2011). The “legitimacy paradox” in US abortion provision. Contraception. 84(3). 307–307. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026