Amihud Gilead

470 total citations
40 papers, 165 citations indexed

About

Amihud Gilead is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Amihud Gilead has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 165 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Philosophy, 8 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Amihud Gilead's work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (6 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers). Amihud Gilead is often cited by papers focused on Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (6 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers). Amihud Gilead collaborates with scholars based in Israel and United Kingdom. Amihud Gilead's co-authors include Berkeley Hill and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Structural Chemistry and Ratio.

In The Last Decade

Amihud Gilead

38 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amihud Gilead Israel 8 58 35 33 23 22 40 165
Christia Mercer United States 7 110 1.9× 111 3.2× 3 0.1× 1 0.0× 18 202
Mark Johnston United States 5 28 0.5× 55 1.6× 2 0.1× 2 0.1× 12 131
Louis Weber France 4 31 0.5× 8 0.2× 5 0.2× 1 0.0× 1 0.0× 18 153
W. J. Mander United Kingdom 6 42 0.7× 69 2.0× 11 0.5× 28 141
Roger Bacon 6 27 0.5× 23 0.7× 1 0.0× 16 108
ca. Proclus 6 40 0.7× 97 2.8× 2 0.1× 30 190
Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson Sweden 7 85 1.5× 85 2.4× 3 0.1× 21 172
Dennis Des Chene United States 6 93 1.6× 49 1.4× 12 136
Wilhelm Ostwald 6 20 0.3× 22 0.7× 7 0.3× 18 101
Karin de Boer Belgium 9 20 0.3× 111 3.2× 3 0.1× 34 154

Countries citing papers authored by Amihud Gilead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amihud Gilead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amihud Gilead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amihud Gilead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amihud Gilead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amihud Gilead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amihud Gilead. The network helps show where Amihud Gilead may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amihud Gilead

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amihud Gilead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amihud Gilead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amihud Gilead. Amihud Gilead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gilead, Amihud. (2022). How Is a Metamorphosis of a Lady into a Fox Possible? A Philosophical Comment on David Garnett's Lady into Fox. Philosophy and literature. 46(2). 398–414. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gilead, Amihud. (2016). The philosophical significance of Alan Mackay’s theoretical discovery of quasicrystals. Structural Chemistry. 28(1). 249–256. 5 indexed citations
4.
Gilead, Amihud. (2015). Self-Referentiality and Two Arguments Refuting Physicalism. International Philosophical Quarterly. 55(4). 471–477. 4 indexed citations
5.
Gilead, Amihud. (2014). We Are Not Replicable. International Philosophical Quarterly. 54(4). 453–460. 5 indexed citations
6.
Gilead, Amihud. (2014). Can Brain Imaging Breach Our Mental Privacy?. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 6(2). 275–291. 10 indexed citations
7.
Gilead, Amihud. (2013). Pure possibilities and some striking scientific discoveries. Foundations of Chemistry. 16(2). 149–163. 7 indexed citations
8.
Gilead, Amihud. (2007). A Humean Argument for Personal Identity. Metaphysica. 9(1). 1–16. 4 indexed citations
9.
Gilead, Amihud. (2004). Philosophical Blindness: Between Arguments and Insights. ˜The œreview of metaphysics. 58(1). 147–170. 2 indexed citations
10.
Gilead, Amihud. (2004). How Many Pure Possibilities Are There. Metaphysica. 5(2). 2 indexed citations
11.
Gilead, Amihud. (2003). Singularity and Other Possibilities. 11 indexed citations
12.
Gilead, Amihud & Berkeley Hill. (2000). Agricultural Incomes and the CAP. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
13.
Gilead, Amihud. (1999). Saving Possibilities. 17 indexed citations
14.
Gilead, Amihud. (1999). How is Akrasia Possible After All?. Ratio. 12(3). 257–270. 1 indexed citations
15.
Gilead, Amihud. (1998). Substance, attributes, and Spinoza's monistic pluralism. The European Legacy. 3(6). 1–14. 1 indexed citations
16.
Gilead, Amihud. (1994). The Platonic Odeyssey. 1 indexed citations
17.
Gilead, Amihud. (1994). The Platonic Odeyssey: A Philosophical-Literary Inquiry Into the Phaedo. 2 indexed citations
18.
Gilead, Amihud. (1990). Spinoza’s Two Causal Chains. Kant-Studien. 81(4). 4 indexed citations
19.
Gilead, Amihud. (1985). Restless and Impelling Reason. Idealistic Studies. 15(2). 137–150. 3 indexed citations
20.
Gilead, Amihud. (1983). Spinoza’s Principium Individuationis and Personal Identity. International Studies in Philosophy. 15(1). 41–57. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026