W. J. Mander

553 citations
28 papers · 141 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

W. J. Mander

23 papers receiving 126 citations

Peers

W. J. Mander
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • General Psychology 12
  • History and Philosophy of Science 42
  • Philosophy 69
  • Religious studies 13
  • History 18
Replace Herbert Schnädelbach with:
Herbert Schnädelbach Germany
Raymond Klibansky Canada
Edith Dudley Sylla United States
Linda López McAlister United States
Stephen R. Palmquist Hong Kong
Daniel W. Graham United States
Herman Philipse Netherlands
John Bussanich United States
Rosamond Kent Sprague United States
Carl A. Huffman United States
W. J. Mander relative to Herbert Schnädelbach Germany Herbert Schnädelbach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Herbert Schnädelbach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. J. Mander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. J. Mander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. J. Mander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. J. Mander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. J. Mander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. J. Mander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. J. Mander. The network helps show where W. J. Mander may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside W. J. Mander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. J. Mander Line = papers co-authored together W. J. Mander links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201137
2 200724
3 199416
4 201411
5 20166
6
The dictionary of nineteenth-century British philosophers
20025
7
Anglo-American Idealism, 1865-1927
20005
8
Collected works of F.H. Bradley
19994
9 20004
10 20004
11 20024
12 19953
13 19973
14 20083
15 20072
16 19982
17
The Unknowable: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Metaphysics
20201
18 19981
19 19911
20 19951

About W. J. Mander

W. J. Mander is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 141 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers) and Political Theory and Influence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (12 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (42 citations), Philosophy (69 citations), Religious studies (13 citations) and History (18 citations). W. J. Mander has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthew E. Merritt, A. Dean Sherry, Craig R. Malloy, Crystal Harrison, F. H. Bradley, Guy Stock and T. L. S. Sprigge. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal for the History of Philosophy, The Heythrop Journal, The Modern Schoolman, Journal of Magnetic Resonance and The Southern Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact