Amber Moore

32 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Amber Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 84
  • Emergency Medical Services 36
  • Emergency Medicine 49
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 19
Replace Andrea Parsons Schram with:
Andrea Parsons Schram United States
Agnes N. Anarado Nigeria
Anna‐Karin Furhoff Sweden
L Westlake United Kingdom
JL Campbell United Kingdom
Faisal Yunus Indonesia
Hamdi Almaramhy Saudi Arabia
I-Hsuan Hwang Taiwan
Carmen Tzanno‐Martins Brazil
Sergio Terrasa Argentina
Amber Moore relative to Andrea Parsons Schram United States Andrea Parsons Schram's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Andrea Parsons Schram · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Moore. The network helps show where Amber Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber Moore Line = papers co-authored together Amber Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200876
2 201443
3 201736
4 201634
5 200933
6 201326
7 201719
8 202017
9 201914
10 201613
11 201012
12 201210
13 20137
14 20206
15 20216
16 20225
17 20215
18 20124
19
Principles of patient management
20044
20 20164

About Amber Moore

Amber Moore is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Complementary and alternative medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Herbal Medicine Research Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers) and Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (12 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (84 citations), Emergency Medical Services (36 citations), Emergency Medicine (49 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (19 citations). Amber Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kylie O’Brien, P. Hartley, David Dawson, Alan Bensoussan, S. Begbie, Helen Zorbas, Alison Evans, Lewis A. Lipsitz, Karen Luxford and Margaret Hayden. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hospital Medicine, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact