Amber Hill

23 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Amber Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Health 233
  • General Health Professions 170
  • Clinical Psychology 120
  • Gender Studies 46
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 85
Replace Dawn Smith with:
Dawn Smith Canada
Juanita J. Chinn United States
Nicole Holm United States
Lois A. Haggerty United States
Lisa Richardson United States
Samantha Schilling United States
Paula Renker United States
Günay Saka Türkiye
Lisa M. Boyd United States
Yolanda R. Davila United States
Amber Hill relative to Dawn Smith Canada Dawn Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Dawn Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Hill. The network helps show where Amber Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber Hill Line = papers co-authored together Amber Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016216
2 200774
3 201936
4 201322
5 201815
6 202014
7 20189
8 20217
9 20197
10 20127
11 20236
12 20206
13 20206
14 20225
15 20225
16 20224
17 20214
18 20223
19 20222
20
Community-based approaches to intimate partner violence : a review of evidence and essential steps to adaptation
20162

About Amber Hill

Amber Hill is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Gender Studies, having authored 24 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (12 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (7 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (233 citations), General Health Professions (170 citations), Clinical Psychology (120 citations), Gender Studies (46 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (85 citations). Amber Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christina Pallitto, Claudı́a Garcia‐Moreno, Jennifer McCleary‐Sills, Elizabeth Miller, Kelley A. Jones, Daniel J. Tancredi, Heather L. McCauley, Jay G. Silverman, Stephanie A. Atkinson and Hertzel C. Gerstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent Health, Journal of Women s Health, Pediatric Diabetes, Violence Against Women and Adolescent Research Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact