Amanda Rees

860 citations
39 papers · 465 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Rees

32 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Amanda Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Geography, Planning and Development 103
  • History and Philosophy of Science 27
  • General Psychology 7
  • Developmental Biology 9
  • Social Psychology 84
Replace Gregg Mitman with:
Gregg Mitman United States
Jennifer Terry United States
David Lipset United States
Alain Corbin France
Franz Boas United States
Robert Borofsky United States
Andrew Shryock United States
Todd Sanders United Kingdom
Robert Brain Canada
Robert Evans
Amanda Rees relative to Gregg Mitman United States Gregg Mitman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gregg Mitman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Rees. The network helps show where Amanda Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Rees Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201477
2 200762
3 201637
4 202034
5 200929
6 200724
7 199022
8 200121
9
Peer Mentoring Communities of Practice for Early and Mid-Career Faculty: Broad Benefits from a Research-Oriented Female Peer Mentoring Group.
201418
10 200017
11 202115
12 200613
13 201713
14 197510
15 202010
16 200110
17 20007
18 20166
19 20095
20 20195

About Amanda Rees

Amanda Rees is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Ecology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (5 papers), Geography Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (3 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (103 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (27 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Developmental Biology (9 citations) and Social Psychology (84 citations). Amanda Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jane Shakespeare‐Finch, Deanne Armstrong, Daniel Block, Stevi Jackson, Timothy L. Hawthorne, Heather Fischer, Jerry Shannon, Patricia Solís, Hamil Pearsall and Mathew Joseph. Their work appears in journals such as Social Studies of Science, Osiris, History of Science, Journal of Peptide Science and Children s Geographies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact