Amanda K. Gilmore

2.9k total citations
137 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Amanda K. Gilmore is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda K. Gilmore has authored 137 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 69 papers in Clinical Psychology, 54 papers in Gender Studies and 39 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Amanda K. Gilmore's work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (54 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (36 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (27 papers). Amanda K. Gilmore is often cited by papers focused on Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (54 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (36 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (27 papers). Amanda K. Gilmore collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Czechia. Amanda K. Gilmore's co-authors include William H. George, Kelly Cue Davis, Jeanette Norris, Melissa A. Lewis, Debra Kaysen, Erin F. Ward‐Ciesielski, Cynthia A. Stappenbeck, Ron Acierno, Kenneth J. Ruggiero and Wendy Muzzy and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Psychopharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Amanda K. Gilmore

122 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Amanda K. Gilmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Clinical Psychology 850
  • Gender Studies 571
  • Sociology and Political Science 537
  • General Health Professions 536
  • Health 423
Replace Cynthia A. Stappenbeck with:
Cynthia A. Stappenbeck United States
Sara A. Vasilenko United States
J. B. Kingree United States
Tami P. Sullivan United States
Kurt H. Dermen United States
Marci Hertz United States
Emily O’Malley Olsen United States
Robert L. Peralta United States
Anna E. Jaffe United States
Heather M. Foran United States
Cynthia A. Stappenbeck United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Amanda K. Gilmore
Amanda K. Gilmore · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Amanda K. Gilmore
Amanda K. Gilmore · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda K. Gilmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda K. Gilmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda K. Gilmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda K. Gilmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda K. Gilmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda K. Gilmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda K. Gilmore. The network helps show where Amanda K. Gilmore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda K. Gilmore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda K. Gilmore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda K. Gilmore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda K. Gilmore. Amanda K. Gilmore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 1
5 0
6 2
7 4
8 3
9 1
10 4
11 18
12 5
13 3
14 2
15 5
16 3
17 14
18 5
19 18
20 59

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026