Amanda Jain

693 total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 513 citations indexed

About

Amanda Jain is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Jain has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 513 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 2 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Amanda Jain's work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers). Amanda Jain is often cited by papers focused on Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers). Amanda Jain collaborates with scholars based in United States. Amanda Jain's co-authors include Fenghai Duan, Ilana F. Gareen, William C. Black, Brenda Brewer, Pamela M. Marcus, David S. Gierada, JoRean D. Sicks, Timothy R. Church, Irene Mahon and Denise R. Aberle and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Cancer and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Jain

5 papers receiving 503 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Results of the Two Incidence Screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial

2013 400 citations Denise R. Aberle, Christine D. Berg et al. New England Journal of Medicine profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amanda Jain United States	5	380	182	114	53	43	5	513
Chineme Enyioha United States	7	282 0.7×	135 0.7×	139 1.2×	53 1.0×	24 0.6×	18	484
Usua Montes Spain	6	514 1.4×	107 0.6×	91 0.8×	37 0.7×	43 1.0×	7	563
Heng‐Sheng Chao Taiwan	13	217 0.6×	165 0.9×	105 0.9×	36 0.7×	26 0.6×	35	449
Suzushi Kusano Japan	8	323 0.8×	208 1.1×	112 1.0×	32 0.6×	28 0.7×	18	482
Genehee Lee South Korea	12	289 0.8×	118 0.6×	151 1.3×	26 0.5×	28 0.7×	33	412
Todd Atwood United States	16	228 0.6×	347 1.9×	64 0.6×	39 0.7×	17 0.4×	41	633
Wendy Perchick United States	6	362 1.0×	120 0.7×	177 1.6×	26 0.5×	10 0.2×	9	475
Pragya Shukla India	12	129 0.3×	98 0.5×	88 0.8×	37 0.7×	45 1.0×	43	398
Marie‐Pierre Campeau Canada	11	336 0.9×	181 1.0×	105 0.9×	24 0.5×	10 0.2×	30	458
Stephen D. Clark United States	7	290 0.8×	136 0.7×	140 1.2×	51 1.0×	7 0.2×	8	506

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Jain

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Jain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Jain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Jain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Jain

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Jain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Jain. The network helps show where Amanda Jain may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Jain

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Jain. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Jain based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Jain. Amanda Jain is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

McComb, Barbara L., Reginald F. Munden, Fenghai Duan, et al.. (2016). Normative reference values of thoracic aortic diameter in American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN 6654) arm of National Lung Screening Trial. Clinical Imaging. 40(5). 936–943. 33 indexed citations

2.

Aberle, Denise R., Christine D. Berg, William C. Black, et al.. (2013). Results of the Two Incidence Screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. New England Journal of Medicine. 369(10). 920–931. 400 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Gareen, Ilana F., et al.. (2012). Identifying and collecting pertinent medical records for centralized abstraction in a multi-center randomized clinical trial: The model used by the American College of Radiology arm of the National Lung Screening Trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 34(1). 36–44. 4 indexed citations

4.

Park, Elyse R., Ilana F. Gareen, Amanda Jain, et al.. (2012). Examining whether lung screening changes risk perceptions: National Lung Screening Trial participants at 1‐year follow‐up. Cancer. 119(7). 1306–1313. 32 indexed citations

5.

Perkins, Kenneth A., Caryn Lerman, Carolyn Fonte, et al.. (2010). Cross-Validation of a New Procedure for Early Screening of Smoking Cessation Medications in Humans. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 88(1). 109–114. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact