Amanda Hunn

1.5k citations
6 papers · 333 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Hunn

6 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Amanda Hunn
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Neurology 130
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 108
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 49
  • Rehabilitation 17
Replace Gary Stier with:
Gary Stier United States
Michael Saginur Canada
Linda Hartman Netherlands
Gary S. Littman United States
Marija Ćavar Croatia
Andrew Schuster United States
Chinmay Deshpande United States
Mohammed F. Islam United States
Jingchun Zeng China
Amanda Hunn relative to Gary Stier United States Gary Stier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gary Stier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Hunn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Hunn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Hunn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Hunn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Hunn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Hunn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Hunn. The network helps show where Amanda Hunn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Hunn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Hunn Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Hunn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 202221
2
Public views on sharing anonymised patient-level data where there is a mixed public and private benefit
20195
3 201837
4
A study to assess the impact of continuing profession development (CPD) on doctors performance and patient/service outcomes. Final report for the GMC
20123
5 2003216
6 200251

About Amanda Hunn

Amanda Hunn is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (130 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (108 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (49 citations) and Rehabilitation (17 citations). Amanda Hunn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include S Beard, Jeremy Wight, Suzy Paisley, Mary P. Tully, Sarah Clément, Lamiece Hassan, Niels Peek, Laura Dormer, Ify Sargeant and Thomas M. Schindler. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Health Technology Assessment, Research Involvement and Engagement and White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026