Eva Feredoes
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Bradley R. PostleMarco Antônio MarcolinFelipe FregniAndrea AntalSergio P. RigonattiÁlvaro Pascual‐LeoneWalter PaulusPaulo S. Boggio
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Eva Feredoes
27 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
- Neurology 974
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 187
- Psychiatry and Mental health 161
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 119
Countries citing papers authored by Eva Feredoes
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Feredoes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Feredoes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Feredoes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Feredoes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Feredoes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Feredoes. The network helps show where Eva Feredoes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Feredoes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Feredoes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Feredoes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Feredoes. Eva Feredoes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 135 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 58 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 111 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memorybreakdown → | 896 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Eva Feredoes
Eva Feredoes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (974 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (187 citations). Eva Feredoes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bradley R. Postle, Marco Antônio Marcolin, Felipe Fregni, Andrea Antal, Sergio P. Rigonatti, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Walter Paulus, Paulo S. Boggio, Michael A. Nitsche and Felix Bermpohl. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.