Amanda Dawson
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Motor Control and Adaptation
- Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
Papers in
-
- Motor Control and Adaptation 3
- Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction 2
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 2
-
- Action Observation and Synchronization 3
- Co-authors
- Laurel J. Buxbaum (4 shared papers)Drew Linsley (1 shared paper)David Α. Rosenbaum (2 shared papers)John H. Challis (1 shared paper)Steven A. Jax (2 shared papers)Katherine J. Kuchenbecker (1 shared paper)Michael Selby (1 shared paper)Albert Rizzo (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Nutrition (2 papers)Advances in experimental medicine and biology (1 paper)Brain Research (1 paper)PM&R (1 paper)Neuropsychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsJapan
In The Last Decade
Amanda Dawson
18 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 177
- Human-Computer Interaction 30
- Rehabilitation 25
- Pharmacology 39
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 9
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Dawson
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Dawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Dawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Dawson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Dawson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Dawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Dawson. The network helps show where Amanda Dawson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Dawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 35 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 2 |
About Amanda Dawson
Amanda Dawson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Physiology, Emergency Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (3 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (2 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (177 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (30 citations), Rehabilitation (25 citations), Pharmacology (39 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (9 citations). Amanda Dawson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Laurel J. Buxbaum, Drew Linsley, David Α. Rosenbaum, John H. Challis, Steven A. Jax, Katherine J. Kuchenbecker, Michael Selby, Albert Rizzo, Susan Duff and J. Michael Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Brain Research, PM&R and Neuropsychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.