Amanda Coupe

20 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Amanda Coupe
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Family Practice 19
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Gender Studies 61
  • Human-Computer Interaction 35
  • Health 26
Replace Elizabeth D. Rosenman with:
Elizabeth D. Rosenman United States
Kyoung‐A Kim South Korea
Mathew S. Lopes United States
Jennifer McIntosh Australia
Kathy L. Hill United States
Margaret E. Thompson United States
Rachel Cusatis United States
Sandra Page United States
Klodiana Kolomitro Canada
Deborah L. Engle United States
Amanda Coupe relative to Elizabeth D. Rosenman United States Elizabeth D. Rosenman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elizabeth D. Rosenman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Coupe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Coupe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Coupe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Coupe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Coupe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Coupe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Coupe. The network helps show where Amanda Coupe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Coupe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Coupe Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Coupe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200872
2 201670
3 202135
4 201930
5 201220
6 201919
7 202019
8 202015
9 201014
10 202112
11 202011
12 202210
13 20209
14 20205
15 20233
16 20232
17 20252
18 20231
19 20221
20 20201

About Amanda Coupe

Amanda Coupe is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Demography, having authored 20 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (19 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Gender Studies (61 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (35 citations) and Health (26 citations). Amanda Coupe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Drouin, Jody M. Ross, Tammy Toscos, Michael Mirro, Jessica Pater, J. Dainty, Ian T. Johnson, Giles O. Elliott, Nigel J. Belshaw and John C. Mathers. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, British Journal of Cancer, JMIR Mental Health, Family Relations and International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact