Amanda Cleeve

34 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Amanda Cleeve
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 369
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 86
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 148
  • Reproductive Medicine 64
  • General Health Professions 88
Replace Anisa Assifi with:
Anisa Assifi Australia
Jamila Perritt United States
Joanna N. Erdman Canada
Nakeisha Blades United States
Kristen M. Shellenberg United States
Alexandre Peregoudov Switzerland
Alice F. Cartwright United States
J. Hassinger United States
Kinga Jelinska Netherlands
Rana Barar United States
Amanda Cleeve relative to Anisa Assifi Australia Anisa Assifi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Anisa Assifi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Cleeve

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Cleeve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Cleeve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Cleeve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Cleeve

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Cleeve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Cleeve. The network helps show where Amanda Cleeve may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Cleeve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Cleeve Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Cleeve links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019157
2 202248
3 201747
4 201535
5 201624
6 201924
7 202021
8 201621
9 202119
10 202213
11 201913
12 202313
13 202112
14 202212
15 202011
16 202110
17 202210
18 20147
19 20196
20 20225

About Amanda Cleeve

Amanda Cleeve is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (28 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (14 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (6 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (1 paper) and Sex work and related issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (369 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (86 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (148 citations), Reproductive Medicine (64 citations) and General Health Professions (88 citations). Amanda Cleeve has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Switzerland and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, Antonella Lavelanet, Margit Endler, Bela Ganatra, Marie Klingberg‐Allvin, Rebecca Gomperts, Elisabeth Faxelid, Fiona de Londras, María I. Rodríguez and Elin C. Larsson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ Global Health, BMC Public Health, Global Health Action and The Lancet Global Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact