Amalio Blanco

1.6k total citations
61 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Amalio Blanco is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amalio Blanco has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Social Psychology, 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 17 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amalio Blanco's work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (16 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (12 papers) and Community Health and Development (10 papers). Amalio Blanco is often cited by papers focused on Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (16 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (12 papers) and Community Health and Development (10 papers). Amalio Blanco collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Colombia and Chile. Amalio Blanco's co-authors include Darío Díaz, Bernardo Moreno Jiménez, Raquel Rodríguez‐Carvajal, Dirk van Dierendonck, Carmen Valle, Ismael Gallardo, María Stavraki, José Manuel Sabucedo Cameselle, Javier Horcajo and Flor Sánchez and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Psychologist and Social Indicators Research.

In The Last Decade

Amalio Blanco

56 papers receiving 974 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amalio Blanco Spain 16 620 361 252 244 159 61 1.1k
Darío Díaz Spain 15 659 1.1× 374 1.0× 257 1.0× 204 0.8× 165 1.0× 51 1.1k
Liat Hamama Israel 20 419 0.7× 574 1.6× 262 1.0× 243 1.0× 114 0.7× 55 1.2k
Matthew Draper United States 7 451 0.7× 499 1.4× 136 0.5× 275 1.1× 107 0.7× 21 953
Adrian J. Tomyn Australia 15 453 0.7× 322 0.9× 162 0.6× 127 0.5× 129 0.8× 33 787
Q. Michael Temane South Africa 14 745 1.2× 554 1.5× 353 1.4× 137 0.6× 207 1.3× 38 1.2k
Güler Boyraz United States 20 412 0.7× 744 2.1× 173 0.7× 159 0.7× 131 0.8× 39 1.1k
Jennifer L. Smith United States 18 602 1.0× 604 1.7× 199 0.8× 223 0.9× 309 1.9× 43 1.4k
Daniel G. Lannin United States 16 529 0.9× 606 1.7× 140 0.6× 221 0.9× 137 0.9× 55 958
William C. Compton United States 14 583 0.9× 337 0.9× 155 0.6× 140 0.6× 165 1.0× 32 967
Susan Furr United States 13 525 0.8× 670 1.9× 187 0.7× 138 0.6× 130 0.8× 31 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Amalio Blanco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amalio Blanco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amalio Blanco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amalio Blanco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amalio Blanco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amalio Blanco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amalio Blanco. The network helps show where Amalio Blanco may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amalio Blanco

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amalio Blanco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amalio Blanco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amalio Blanco. Amalio Blanco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barreto, Idaly, et al.. (2022). Validación cognitiva de un protocolo instruccional de reexperimentación emocional en adultos víctimas de violencia política en Colombia. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 25(2). 104–121. 2 indexed citations
2.
Sánchez, Flor, Daniela De Filippo, Amalio Blanco, & María Luisa Lascurain-Sánchez. (2022). Contribution of Social Psychology Research to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Spanish Publications. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 25. e22–e22. 2 indexed citations
3.
Barreto, Idaly, et al.. (2021). Diseño y análisis psicométrico del Instrumento de Evaluación de Trauma Psicosocial. Suma Psicológica. 28(1). 52–61. 3 indexed citations
4.
Barreto, Idaly, et al.. (2019). Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 44(11). 920–937. 11 indexed citations
5.
Blanco, Amalio, et al.. (2018). Post-traumatic cognitions and quality of life in terrorism victims: the role of well-being in indirect versus direct exposure. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 16(1). 96–96. 15 indexed citations
6.
Blanco, Amalio, et al.. (2016). Social (dis)order and psychosocial trauma: Look earlier, look outside, and look beyond the persons.. American Psychologist. 71(3). 187–198. 29 indexed citations
7.
Blanco, Amalio, et al.. (2010). El sentido del mundo y el significado del yo: Inventario de Cogniciones Postraumáticas (ICPT) en población hispana. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. 42(1). 97–110. 5 indexed citations
8.
Blanco, Amalio, et al.. (2008). Bienestar, autoestima, depresión y anomia en personas que no han sido víctimas de violencia política y social. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(2). 214–231. 6 indexed citations
9.
Blanco, Amalio & Darío Díaz. (2007). Social order and mental health: a social wellbeing approach. 61–71. 14 indexed citations
10.
Blanco, Amalio & Darío Díaz. (2006). Orden social y salud mental: Una aproximación desde el bienestar social. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10 indexed citations
11.
Blanco, Amalio & Darío Díaz. (2005). El bienestar social: su concepto y medición. Psicothema. 17(4). 582–589. 92 indexed citations
12.
Carrera, Pilar, Amparo Caballero, Flor Sánchez, & Amalio Blanco. (2005). Emociones mixtas y conducta de riesgo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. 37(1). 119–130. 6 indexed citations
13.
Cameselle, José Manuel Sabucedo, et al.. (2004). Una Función Ética de la Psicología Social:Los Estudios sobre el Fondo Ideológico de la Violencia Política. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
14.
Caballero, Amparo, Pilar Carrera, Flor Sánchez, Dolores Muñoz, & Amalio Blanco. (2003). La experiencia emocional como predictor de los comportamientos de riesgo. Psicothema. 15(3). 427–432. 14 indexed citations
15.
Cameselle, José Manuel Sabucedo, et al.. (2003). Beliefs which legitimize political violence against the innocent. Psicothema. 15(4). 550–555. 32 indexed citations
16.
Blanco, Amalio, et al.. (2002). La década 1989-1998 en la Psicología Española:Un análisis de la Investigación en Psicología Social. Papeles del Psicólogo - Psychologist Papers. 25–43. 3 indexed citations
17.
Blanco, Amalio. (2001). Un relato breve sobre la enseñanzade la Psicología en España. Papeles del Psicólogo - Psychologist Papers. 3–13. 2 indexed citations
18.
Blanco, Amalio, et al.. (2001). The Decade 1989–1998 in Spanish Psychology: An Analysis of Research in Social Psychology. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 4(2). 203–218. 8 indexed citations
19.
Blanco, Amalio. (1993). Paternidades y filiaciones en la psicología social. Psicothema. 5(1). 13–29. 2 indexed citations
20.
Blanco, Amalio, et al.. (1989). IgA1, IgA2 or secretory piece containing antigliadin antibodies in the sera of coeliac patients.. PubMed. 17(2). 77–80. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026