Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: Testing a mediator model.
2001561 citationsRichard M. Lee, Matthew Draper et al.Journal of Counseling Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Draper
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Draper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Draper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Draper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Draper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Draper. The network helps show where Matthew Draper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Draper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Draper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Draper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Draper. Matthew Draper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Draper, Matthew, et al.. (2017). Grace as Psychotherapy: Suggestions for Therapists with Latter-day Saint Clients. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 38(1). 11.1 indexed citations
6.
Draper, Matthew, et al.. (2015). Forensic Psychology Reconsidered: A Critique of Mental Illness and the Courts.2 indexed citations
Draper, Matthew, et al.. (2014). Shared Embodiment and Shared Conversation: Compassion in Clinical Forensics. 6(1). 77.
9.
Braswell, Michael C., et al.. (2014). Transforming Corrections: Humanistic Approaches to Corrections and Offender Treatment, 2nd Edition. Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University).4 indexed citations
10.
Draper, Matthew, et al.. (2013). Joining With the Client in an Open Event. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 57(6). 752–759.
Erdur‐Baker, Özgür, Stephanie S. Rude, Augustíne Barón, & Matthew Draper. (2000). Working Alliance and Treatment Outcome in Ethnically Similar and Dissimilar Client-Therapist Pairings.15 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Timothy B. & Matthew Draper. (1999). Beyond the Study of the Natural Man: A Gospel Perspective on Human Nature. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 24(1). 184–199.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.