A.M. Davis

1.3k total citations
15 papers, 742 citations indexed

About

A.M. Davis is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Software. According to data from OpenAlex, A.M. Davis has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 742 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 10 papers in Information Systems and 4 papers in Software. Recurrent topics in A.M. Davis's work include Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (11 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (8 papers) and Software Engineering Research (7 papers). A.M. Davis is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (11 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (8 papers) and Software Engineering Research (7 papers). A.M. Davis collaborates with scholars based in United States and Spain. A.M. Davis's co-authors include Ann M. Hickey, Edward H. Bersoff, Pei Hsia, David Chenho Kung, Peter A. Freeman, Natália Juristo, Ana M. Moreno and Óscar Dieste and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Computer and Journal of Lightwave Technology.

In The Last Decade

A.M. Davis

15 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A.M. Davis United States 9 572 313 135 104 73 15 742
Mordechai Ben-Menachem Israel 7 520 0.9× 351 1.1× 207 1.5× 132 1.3× 91 1.2× 20 771
Kenneth S. Rubin United States 7 333 0.6× 228 0.7× 100 0.7× 97 0.9× 54 0.7× 13 630
Heinz Züllighoven Germany 11 337 0.6× 265 0.8× 127 0.9× 130 1.3× 65 0.9× 32 625
Dean Leffingwell 8 727 1.3× 274 0.9× 127 0.9× 162 1.6× 120 1.6× 9 869
Lucia Rapanotti United Kingdom 13 500 0.9× 468 1.5× 161 1.2× 71 0.7× 52 0.7× 81 710
Johan Natt och Dag Sweden 12 782 1.4× 367 1.2× 171 1.3× 95 0.9× 56 0.8× 14 852
Clive Finkelstein United Kingdom 4 693 1.2× 327 1.0× 282 2.1× 119 1.1× 107 1.5× 7 836
Cornelius Ncube United Kingdom 14 428 0.7× 284 0.9× 70 0.5× 102 1.0× 112 1.5× 26 638
Kendall Scott United States 5 332 0.6× 275 0.9× 178 1.3× 117 1.1× 131 1.8× 8 621
Colin J. Neill United States 11 365 0.6× 209 0.7× 90 0.7× 61 0.6× 57 0.8× 57 548

Countries citing papers authored by A.M. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.M. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.M. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.M. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.M. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.M. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.M. Davis. The network helps show where A.M. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.M. Davis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.M. Davis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.M. Davis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.M. Davis. A.M. Davis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Davis, A.M., Óscar Dieste, Ann M. Hickey, Natália Juristo, & Ana M. Moreno. (2006). Scientific publication in requirements engineering in spain: an analysis in a european context. IEEE Latin America Transactions. 4(2). 123–129. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hickey, Ann M. & A.M. Davis. (2004). Elicitation technique selection: how do experts do it?. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 169–178. 134 indexed citations
4.
Davis, A.M.. (2003). The art of requirements triage. Computer. 36(3). 42–49. 122 indexed citations
5.
Davis, A.M., et al.. (2002). Criteria for selecting software process models. 521–528. 15 indexed citations
6.
Davis, A.M., et al.. (2002). Some ideas for a method-independent requirements environment. iii. 36–42. 1 indexed citations
7.
Davis, A.M., et al.. (2002). Requirements engineering metamodel: An integrated view of requirements. 472–478. 4 indexed citations
8.
Davis, A.M.. (1998). More Words Of Wisdom. IEEE Software. 15(3). 6–8. 8 indexed citations
9.
Davis, A.M.. (1998). Predictions and Farewells [From the Editor]. IEEE Software. 15(4). 6–9. 7 indexed citations
10.
Davis, A.M. & Pei Hsia. (1994). Giving voice to requirements engineering. IEEE Software. 11(2). 12–16. 24 indexed citations
11.
Davis, A.M., et al.. (1994). Rewards of taking the path less traveled. IEEE Software. 11(4). 100–101. 4 indexed citations
12.
Hsia, Pei, A.M. Davis, & David Chenho Kung. (1993). Status report: requirements engineering. IEEE Software. 10(6). 75–79. 81 indexed citations
13.
Davis, A.M.. (1992). Operational prototyping: a new development approach. IEEE Software. 9(5). 70–78. 102 indexed citations
14.
Davis, A.M. & Peter A. Freeman. (1991). Guest Editors' Introduction: Requirements Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 17(3). 210–211. 5 indexed citations
15.
Davis, A.M., et al.. (1988). A strategy for comparing alternative software development life cycle models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 14(10). 1453–1461. 145 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026