Alys Cole‐King

504 citations
13 papers · 308 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Alys Cole‐King

13 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Alys Cole‐King
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Occupational Therapy 73
  • Rehabilitation 83
  • Clinical Psychology 87
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 10
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 39
Replace Xue‐Lei Fu with:
Xue‐Lei Fu China
Ryszard Plinta Poland
Adrienne Taylor United Kingdom
Ayodele Teslim Onigbinde Nigeria
Gabriele Biguet Sweden
Ben Rogers Australia
Julie Green United Kingdom
Justyna Leszczak Poland
Karl S. Bagraith Australia
Carlijn H. van der Zee Netherlands
Alys Cole‐King relative to Xue‐Lei Fu China Xue‐Lei Fu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Xue‐Lei Fu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alys Cole‐King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alys Cole‐King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alys Cole‐King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alys Cole‐King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alys Cole‐King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alys Cole‐King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alys Cole‐King. The network helps show where Alys Cole‐King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Alys Cole‐King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alys Cole‐King Line = papers co-authored together Alys Cole‐King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2001203
2 201337
3 201920
4 201315
5 20019
6 20178
7 20104
8
“Dying to Help”: female doctor suicide and the NHS workforce crisis.
20173
9 20133
10 20112
11 20112
12 20111
13
Re: Suicidality and aggression during antidepressant treatment: systematic review and meta-analyses based on clinical study reports (Sharma et al, 352:i65, 2016)
20161

About Alys Cole‐King

Alys Cole‐King is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pharmacology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (1 paper), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper) and Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (73 citations), Rehabilitation (83 citations), Clinical Psychology (87 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (10 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (39 citations). Alys Cole‐King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Keith G Harding, Stephen Platt, Linda Gask, Kevin Hines, Gill Green, Helen Williams, Victoria A. Parker, Paul Ramchandani, S. M. Yentis and Mark Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, Anaesthesia, Psychosomatic Medicine, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact