Alis J. Deason
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.5%
- Instrumentation top 0.5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Vasily BelokurovS. E. KoposovDenis ErkalN. W. EvansRobert J. J. GrandAzadeh FattahiCarlos S. FrenkFacundo A. Gómez
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (51 papers)Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (50 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (38 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Alis J. Deason
65 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 3.5k
- Instrumentation 1.8k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 295
- Computational Mechanics 86
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 85
Countries citing papers authored by Alis J. Deason
This map shows the geographic impact of Alis J. Deason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alis J. Deason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alis J. Deason more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alis J. Deason
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alis J. Deason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alis J. Deason. The network helps show where Alis J. Deason may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alis J. Deason
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alis J. Deason. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alis J. Deason based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alis J. Deason. Alis J. Deason is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 95 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 66 | |
| 12 | 82 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 60 | |
| 17 | 93 | |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | Milky Way Cosmology: Laying the Foundation for Full 6-D Dynamical Mapping of the Nearby Universe | 1 |
| 20 | 80 |
About Alis J. Deason
Alis J. Deason is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Ecology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (51 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (50 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (38 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (1.8k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (3.5k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (295 citations). Alis J. Deason has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Vasily Belokurov, S. E. Koposov, Denis Erkal, N. W. Evans, N. W. Evans, Robert J. J. Grand, Azadeh Fattahi, Carlos S. Frenk, Facundo A. Gómez and Federico Marinacci. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.