Lina Necib
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Jesse ThalerMariangela LisantiYanou CuiKaustubh AgasheIan MoultAnna FrebelVasily BelokurovGordan Krnjaic
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (21 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (19 papers)Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (17 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersThe Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Lina Necib
37 papers receiving 761 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 535
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 518
- Instrumentation 140
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 44
- Artificial Intelligence 42
Countries citing papers authored by Lina Necib
This map shows the geographic impact of Lina Necib's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lina Necib with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lina Necib more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lina Necib
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lina Necib. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lina Necib. The network helps show where Lina Necib may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lina Necib
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lina Necib. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lina Necib based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lina Necib. Lina Necib is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | 137 |
About Lina Necib
Lina Necib is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 829 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (21 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (19 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (535 citations), Instrumentation (140 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (518 citations). Lina Necib has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jesse Thaler, Mariangela Lisanti, Yanou Cui, Kaustubh Agashe, Ian Moult, Anna Frebel, Vasily Belokurov, Gordan Krnjaic, P. Machado and Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.