Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Determinants of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm value: Evidence from the emerging market of Turkey
2016323 citationsCemil Kuzey, Ali UyarJournal of Cleaner Productionprofile →
Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare
2021156 citationsAli Uyar, Cemil Kuzey et al.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ali Uyar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ali Uyar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ali Uyar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ali Uyar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ali Uyar. The network helps show where Ali Uyar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ali Uyar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ali Uyar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ali Uyar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ali Uyar. Ali Uyar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Uyar, Ali, et al.. (2018). Does Social Media Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Turkish Firms Using Three Social Media Metrics. 21(2).6 indexed citations
13.
Kılıç, Merve, et al.. (2014). Preparedness for and perception of IFRS for SMEs: evidence from Turkey. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems. 13(3). 492–519.24 indexed citations
14.
Uyar, Ali. (2013). ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONALS PERCEPTIONS OF ETHICS EDUCATION: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems. 12(1). 61–75.14 indexed citations
15.
Uyar, Ali, et al.. (2011). Professional Knowledge and Skills Required for Accounting Majors Who Intend to Become Auditors: Perceptions of External Auditors. Business and Economics Research Journal. 2(3). 1–33.23 indexed citations
16.
Uyar, Ali, et al.. (2011). Factors Affecting Students’ Career Choice In Accounting: The Case of a Turkish University. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Uyar, Ali, et al.. (2011). Factors Associated with Student Performance in Financial Accounting Course. 4(2). 141–156.28 indexed citations
18.
Uyar, Ali. (2010). Cost and Management Accounting Practices: A Survey of Manufacturing Companies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(6). 113–125.39 indexed citations
19.
Uyar, Ali. (2009). Küresel Ekonomik Krizin Sirketlerin Nakit Dönüsüm Sürelerine Etkileri: İMKB’de İslem Gören Sirketler Üzerinde Bir Çalısma. 228–235.3 indexed citations
20.
Uyar, Ali. (2008). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Quality Initiatives and Financial Performance. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.