Ali H. Sayyed
- Insect Science top 0.1%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Plant Science top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Denis J. WrightMushtaq A. SaleemMunir AhmadNeil CrickmoreMushtaq AhmadShafqat SaeedBen RaymondSarfraz Ali Shad
- Topics
- Insect Resistance and Genetics (52 papers)Insect Pest Control Strategies (33 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (29 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPakistanSpain
In The Last Decade
Ali H. Sayyed
61 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Insect Science 2.7k
- Molecular Biology 2.5k
- Plant Science 1.9k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 144
- Genetics 103
Countries citing papers authored by Ali H. Sayyed
This map shows the geographic impact of Ali H. Sayyed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ali H. Sayyed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ali H. Sayyed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ali H. Sayyed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ali H. Sayyed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ali H. Sayyed. The network helps show where Ali H. Sayyed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ali H. Sayyed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ali H. Sayyed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ali H. Sayyed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ali H. Sayyed. Ali H. Sayyed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Effect of copper sulphate and lead nitrate, administered alone or in combination, on the histology of liver and kidney of Labeo rohita. | 12 |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 117 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | Toxicity of some commonly used insecticides against Coccinella undecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). | 24 |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 91 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 87 | |
| 12 | 105 | |
| 13 | 106 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 131 | |
| 16 | 96 | |
| 17 | 146 | |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 74 |
About Ali H. Sayyed
Ali H. Sayyed is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Resistance and Genetics (52 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (33 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (29 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (2.7k citations), Plant Science (1.9k citations) and Molecular Biology (2.5k citations). Ali H. Sayyed has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Pakistan and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Denis J. Wright, Mushtaq A. Saleem, Munir Ahmad, Neil Crickmore, Mushtaq Ahmad, Shafqat Saeed, Ben Raymond, Sarfraz Ali Shad, Muhammad Ali and Dzolkhifli Omar. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Ecology Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.