Sanne ten Oever

1.8k total citations
45 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Sanne ten Oever is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sanne ten Oever has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Sanne ten Oever's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (16 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers). Sanne ten Oever is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (16 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers). Sanne ten Oever collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Sanne ten Oever's co-authors include Alexander T. Sack, Tom A. de Graaf, Nienke van Atteveldt, Benedikt Zoefel, Andrea E. Martin, Nina Bien, Teresa Schuhmann, Rainer Goebel, Elana Zion Golumbic and Charles M. Schroeder and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Sanne ten Oever

43 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sanne ten Oever Netherlands 21 905 320 126 110 105 45 1.1k
Daniel A. Levy Israel 22 1.2k 1.3× 239 0.7× 77 0.6× 146 1.3× 92 0.9× 63 1.3k
Ryszard Auksztulewicz Germany 19 1.1k 1.2× 235 0.7× 50 0.4× 101 0.9× 54 0.5× 43 1.3k
Hanneke van Dijk Netherlands 15 1.4k 1.5× 162 0.5× 130 1.0× 88 0.8× 59 0.6× 37 1.5k
Arjen Alink Germany 18 1.8k 2.0× 349 1.1× 42 0.3× 185 1.7× 74 0.7× 36 2.0k
Pingbo Yin United States 20 1.1k 1.2× 182 0.6× 211 1.7× 135 1.2× 198 1.9× 34 1.3k
Benedikt Zoefel France 15 1.2k 1.3× 223 0.7× 80 0.6× 48 0.4× 47 0.4× 27 1.3k
Nadia Müller Germany 19 1.4k 1.5× 354 1.1× 333 2.6× 122 1.1× 399 3.8× 29 1.7k
Corby L. Dale United States 13 1.0k 1.1× 243 0.8× 47 0.4× 94 0.9× 37 0.4× 22 1.1k
Hweeling Lee Germany 10 536 0.6× 214 0.7× 50 0.4× 67 0.6× 93 0.9× 13 712
K. N’Diaye France 17 1.1k 1.3× 414 1.3× 130 1.0× 255 2.3× 73 0.7× 34 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Sanne ten Oever

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sanne ten Oever's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sanne ten Oever with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sanne ten Oever more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sanne ten Oever

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sanne ten Oever. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sanne ten Oever. The network helps show where Sanne ten Oever may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sanne ten Oever

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sanne ten Oever. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sanne ten Oever based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sanne ten Oever. Sanne ten Oever is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Oever, Sanne ten, et al.. (2025). Enhancing cognitive performance with fronto-parietal transcranial alternating current stimulation. Biological Psychology. 200. 109111–109111.
2.
Oever, Sanne ten, et al.. (2025). Simultaneous tACS-fMRI reveals state- and frequency-specific modulation of hippocampal-cortical functional connectivity. Communications Psychology. 3(1). 19–19. 2 indexed citations
3.
Oever, Sanne ten, et al.. (2022). Neural tracking of phrases in spoken language comprehension is automatic and task-dependent. eLife. 11. 23 indexed citations
4.
Oever, Sanne ten, et al.. (2022). Inferring the nature of linguistic computations in the brain. PLoS Computational Biology. 18(7). e1010269–e1010269. 8 indexed citations
5.
Graaf, Tom A. de, et al.. (2022). Parietal but not temporoparietal alpha-tACS modulates endogenous visuospatial attention. Cortex. 154. 149–166. 9 indexed citations
6.
Sack, Alexander T., et al.. (2022). Frequency-specific transcranial neuromodulation of alpha power alters visuospatial attention performance. Brain Research. 1782. 147834–147834. 28 indexed citations
7.
Oever, Sanne ten, et al.. (2021). No evidence of rhythmic visuospatial attention at cued locations in a spatial cuing paradigm, regardless of their behavioural relevance. European Journal of Neuroscience. 55(11-12). 3100–3116. 11 indexed citations
8.
Oever, Sanne ten, et al.. (2021). Phase and power modulations on the amplitude of TMS-induced motor evoked potentials. PLoS ONE. 16(9). e0255815–e0255815. 20 indexed citations
9.
Sack, Alexander T., et al.. (2021). Calibrating rhythmic stimulation parameters to individual electroencephalography markers: The consistency of individual alpha frequency in practical lab settings. European Journal of Neuroscience. 55(11-12). 3418–3437. 8 indexed citations
10.
Graaf, Tom A. de, et al.. (2020). Does alpha phase modulate visual target detection? Three experiments with tACS‐phase‐based stimulus presentation. European Journal of Neuroscience. 51(11). 2299–2313. 20 indexed citations
11.
Bosker, Hans Rutger, et al.. (2020). Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy. Journal of Neuroscience. 40(49). 9467–9475. 67 indexed citations
12.
Valente, Giancarlo, Erik D. Gommer, João Correia, et al.. (2020). Combining Gamma With Alpha and Beta Power Modulation for Enhanced Cortical Mapping in Patients With Focal Epilepsy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 14. 555054–555054. 1 indexed citations
13.
Jacobs, Christianne, et al.. (2019). Coarse Image Information Guides Integration of Fine Details (if You Let It). Perception. 48. 180–181. 1 indexed citations
14.
Engelen, Tahnée, Sanne ten Oever, Teresa Schuhmann, et al.. (2018). Phase of beta-frequency tACS over primary motor cortex modulates corticospinal excitability. Cortex. 103. 142–152. 47 indexed citations
15.
Zoefel, Benedikt, Sanne ten Oever, & Alexander T. Sack. (2018). The Involvement of Endogenous Neural Oscillations in the Processing of Rhythmic Input: More Than a Regular Repetition of Evoked Neural Responses. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 12. 95–95. 115 indexed citations
16.
Oever, Sanne ten, Charles M. Schroeder, David Poeppel, et al.. (2017). Low-Frequency Cortical Oscillations Entrain to Subthreshold Rhythmic Auditory Stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience. 37(19). 4903–4912. 53 indexed citations
17.
Oever, Sanne ten, Lars Gutschalk Hausfeld, João Correia, et al.. (2016). A 7T fMRI study investigating the influence of oscillatory phase on syllable representations. NeuroImage. 141. 1–9. 9 indexed citations
18.
Oever, Sanne ten, Vincenzo Romei, Nienke van Atteveldt, et al.. (2016). The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing. Experimental Brain Research. 234(5). 1307–1323. 42 indexed citations
19.
Oever, Sanne ten, Charles M. Schroeder, David Poeppel, Nienke van Atteveldt, & Elana Zion Golumbic. (2014). Rhythmicity and cross-modal temporal cues facilitate detection. Neuropsychologia. 63. 43–50. 60 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026