Alexander Rothkegel
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neural dynamics and brain function 4
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 1
-
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques 1
- stochastic dynamics and bifurcation 1
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence 1
-
- Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation 3
-
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 2
-
- Surgical Simulation and Training 1
- Co-authors
- Klaus LehnertzStephan BialonskiMarie‐Therese HorstmannMatthäus StaniekTobias WagnerShrirang V. RanadeJoshua HorvathMichael Schneider
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceStatistical and Nonlinear PhysicsComputer Networks and Communications
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Europhysics Letters (EPL) (1 paper)New Journal of Physics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Alexander Rothkegel
6 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Cognitive Neuroscience 207
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 107
- Computer Networks and Communications 166
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 37
- Economics and Econometrics 32
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Rothkegel
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Rothkegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Rothkegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Rothkegel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Rothkegel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Rothkegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Rothkegel. The network helps show where Alexander Rothkegel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Rothkegel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 86 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 171 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 16 |
About Alexander Rothkegel
Alexander Rothkegel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 6 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (1 paper), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (1 paper), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (1 paper) and Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (207 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (107 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (166 citations). Alexander Rothkegel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Lehnertz, Stephan Bialonski, Marie‐Therese Horstmann, Matthäus Staniek, Tobias Wagner, Shrirang V. Ranade, Joshua Horvath, Michael Schneider, Clemens Wagner and Giulio Barteselli. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Europhysics Letters (EPL) and New Journal of Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.