Joshua Horvath

1.1k total citations
19 papers, 941 citations indexed

About

Joshua Horvath is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joshua Horvath has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 941 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 5 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Joshua Horvath's work include Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers). Joshua Horvath is often cited by papers focused on Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers). Joshua Horvath collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Canada. Joshua Horvath's co-authors include Andrew J. Gellman, Preeti Kamakoti, David S. Sholl, Giulio Barteselli, Vladimir Bantseev, Natasha Singh, Fan Tang, Anthony P. Adamis, Ya‐Wen Chiang and Peter A. Campochiaro and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

In The Last Decade

Joshua Horvath

17 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joshua Horvath United States 11 520 324 245 191 165 19 941
Yunjie Yu China 16 463 0.9× 544 1.7× 262 1.1× 71 0.4× 18 0.1× 33 1.2k
Kelly G. Casey United States 11 127 0.2× 133 0.4× 281 1.1× 93 0.5× 140 0.8× 19 779
Ivan Buchvarov Bulgaria 21 208 0.4× 759 2.3× 213 0.9× 8 0.0× 114 0.7× 127 1.4k
Lewis E. MacKenzie United Kingdom 15 107 0.2× 71 0.2× 831 3.4× 19 0.1× 208 1.3× 29 1.2k
C. Chudoba United States 13 344 0.7× 1.0k 3.2× 208 0.8× 55 0.3× 79 0.5× 23 1.6k
P. B. Lukins Australia 16 180 0.3× 217 0.7× 375 1.5× 9 0.0× 61 0.4× 38 868
Curtis F. Chapman United States 10 279 0.5× 485 1.5× 172 0.7× 20 0.1× 88 0.5× 16 1.1k
Silke Oellerich Netherlands 27 70 0.1× 335 1.0× 90 0.4× 1.2k 6.0× 34 0.2× 98 2.3k
E. Birckner Germany 12 42 0.1× 81 0.3× 235 1.0× 118 0.6× 40 0.2× 25 726
Paul A. Fleitz United States 22 985 1.9× 200 0.6× 1.2k 5.0× 17 0.1× 63 0.4× 65 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Joshua Horvath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua Horvath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua Horvath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua Horvath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joshua Horvath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua Horvath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua Horvath. The network helps show where Joshua Horvath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua Horvath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua Horvath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua Horvath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua Horvath. Joshua Horvath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Pieramici, Dante J., Peter A. Campochiaro, Margaret Chang, et al.. (2025). Structural Updates to the Implant and Refill Needle of the Port Delivery Platform. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 14(4). 8–8.
2.
3.
Bittner, Beate, Manuel Sánchez-Félix, Athanas Koynov, et al.. (2023). Drug delivery breakthrough technologies – A perspective on clinical and societal impact. Journal of Controlled Release. 360. 335–343.
4.
Shrestha, Dev, et al.. (2022). Investigation of Human Intrathecal Solute Transport Dynamics Using a Novel in vitro Cerebrospinal Fluid System Analog. PubMed. 1. 879098–879098. 6 indexed citations
5.
Sadekar, Shraddha, Samira Jamalian, Julien Lafrance‐Vanasse, et al.. (2022). Translational Approaches for Brain Delivery of Biologics via Cerebrospinal Fluid. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 111(4). 826–834. 27 indexed citations
6.
Kelley, Robert F., Devin B. Tesar, Yue Wang, et al.. (2022). Generation of a Porcine Antibody Fab Fragment Using Protein Engineering to Facilitate the Evaluation of Ocular Sustained Delivery Technology. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 19(5). 1540–1547. 1 indexed citations
7.
Barteselli, Giulio, Michael Schneider, Alexander Rothkegel, et al.. (2021). A custom virtual reality training solution for ophthalmologic surgical clinical trials. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(1). 12–12. 8 indexed citations
8.
Bantseev, Vladimir, Joshua Horvath, Giulio Barteselli, et al.. (2020). Nonclinical Toxicology and Biocompatibility Program Supporting Clinical Development and Registration of the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Toxicologic Pathology. 49(3). 663–672. 9 indexed citations
9.
Campochiaro, Peter A., Dennis M. Marcus, Carl C. Awh, et al.. (2019). The Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology. 126(8). 1141–1154. 184 indexed citations
10.
Bantseev, Vladimir, Helen Booler, Joshua Horvath, et al.. (2019). EVALUATION OF SURGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING VITREOUS HEMORRHAGE FOLLOWING PORT DELIVERY SYSTEM WITH RANIBIZUMAB IMPLANT INSERTION IN A MINIPIG MODEL. Retina. 40(8). 1520–1528. 19 indexed citations
11.
Gellman, Andrew J., et al.. (2016). Structure-sensitive enantiospecific adsorption on naturally chiral Cu(hkl) R&S surfaces. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 29(3). 34001–34001. 22 indexed citations
12.
Horvath, Joshua, et al.. (2008). Enantiospecific Orientation of R–3-Methylcyclohexanone on the Chiral Cu(643)R/S Surfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 112(20). 7637–7643. 31 indexed citations
13.
Horvath, Joshua, et al.. (2004). Enantioselective Separation on a Naturally Chiral Surface. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 126(45). 14988–14994. 155 indexed citations
14.
Zhao, Xueying, Scott S. Perry, Joshua Horvath, & Andrew J. Gellman. (2004). Adsorbate induced kink formation in straight step edges on Cu(533) and Cu(221). Surface Science. 563(1-3). 217–224. 25 indexed citations
15.
Kamakoti, Preeti, Joshua Horvath, Andrew J. Gellman, & David S. Sholl. (2004). Titration of chiral kink sites on Cu(643) using iodine adsorption. Surface Science. 563(1-3). 206–216. 10 indexed citations
16.
Horvath, Joshua & Andrew J. Gellman. (2003). Naturally Chiral Surfaces. Topics in Catalysis. 25(1-4). 9–15. 75 indexed citations
17.
Horvath, Joshua & Andrew J. Gellman. (2002). Enantiospecific Desorption of Chiral Compounds from Chiral Cu(643) and Achiral Cu(111) Surfaces. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 124(10). 2384–2392. 137 indexed citations
18.
Gellman, Andrew J., et al.. (2001). Chiral single crystal surface chemistry. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical. 167(1-2). 3–11. 99 indexed citations
19.
Horvath, Joshua & Andrew J. Gellman. (2001). Enantiospecific Desorption of R- and S-Propylene Oxide from a Chiral Cu(643) Surface. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 123(32). 7953–7954. 130 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yunjie Yu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kelly G. Casey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ivan Buchvarov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lewis E. MacKenzie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Chudoba Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. B. Lukins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Curtis F. Chapman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Silke Oellerich Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. Birckner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul A. Fleitz
Rankless by CCL
2026