Alejandro Tena

3.0k citations
112 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Alejandro Tena

109 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Alejandro Tena
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Insect Science 1.9k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
  • Horticulture 30
  • Plant Science 1.0k
  • Genetics 373
Replace Fernando L. Cônsoli with:
Fernando L. Cônsoli Brazil
Walker A. Jones United States
Ângelo Pallini Brazil
Annette Reineke Germany
Rachid Hanna Benin
Anne Le Ralec France
Jean‐François Vayssières France
Yolanda H. Chen United States
Kazuki Miura Japan
Lance S. Osborne United States
Alejandro Tena relative to Fernando L. Cônsoli Brazil Fernando L. Cônsoli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Fernando L. Cônsoli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alejandro Tena

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alejandro Tena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alejandro Tena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alejandro Tena more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alejandro Tena

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alejandro Tena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alejandro Tena. The network helps show where Alejandro Tena may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alejandro Tena, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alejandro Tena Line = papers co-authored together Alejandro Tena links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019128
2 2017104
3 201695
4 201891
5 201290
6 201678
7 201570
8 201366
9 201257
10 201055
11 201351
12 201851
13 201448
14 202247
15 201237
16 199837
17 201336
18 201636
19 200835
20 202135

About Alejandro Tena

Alejandro Tena is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (85 papers), Plant and animal studies (44 papers), Research on scale insects (29 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (25 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (16 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (14 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (14 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.9k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations), Horticulture (30 citations), Plant Science (1.0k citations) and Genetics (373 citations). Alejandro Tena has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alberto Urbaneja, Apostolos Pekas, Ferrán García Marí, Felix Wäckers, Joel González‐Cabrera, Marcel Dicke, Pablo Urbaneja‐Bernat, Apostolos Kapranas, Nicolas Desneux and Kévin Tougeron. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Control, Journal of Pest Science, Ecological Entomology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Current Opinion in Insect Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact