Aida Grau‐Atienza
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Biomedical Engineering
- Catalysis top 10%
- Co-authors
- Javier García‐MartínezElena SerranoEnrique V. Ramos–FernándezNoemi LinaresAntonio Sepúlveda‐EscribanoJoaquín Silvestre‐AlberoAlexander SachseErika de Oliveira Jardim
- Topics
- Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (7 papers)Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (6 papers)Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Aida Grau‐Atienza
18 papers receiving 610 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Materials Chemistry 371
- Inorganic Chemistry 334
- Mechanical Engineering 154
- Biomedical Engineering 93
- Catalysis 90
Countries citing papers authored by Aida Grau‐Atienza
This map shows the geographic impact of Aida Grau‐Atienza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aida Grau‐Atienza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aida Grau‐Atienza more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aida Grau‐Atienza
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aida Grau‐Atienza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aida Grau‐Atienza. The network helps show where Aida Grau‐Atienza may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aida Grau‐Atienza
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aida Grau‐Atienza. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aida Grau‐Atienza based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aida Grau‐Atienza. Aida Grau‐Atienza is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 53 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 60 | |
| 7 | 60 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 84 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 24 |
About Aida Grau‐Atienza
Aida Grau‐Atienza is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology and Catalysis, having authored 18 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (7 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (6 papers) and Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (334 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (50 citations) and Catalysis (90 citations). Aida Grau‐Atienza has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Javier García‐Martínez, Elena Serrano, Enrique V. Ramos–Fernández, Noemi Linares, Antonio Sepúlveda‐Escribano, Joaquín Silvestre‐Albero, Alexander Sachse, Erika de Oliveira Jardim, Sónia Aguado and David Farrusseng. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry of Materials, Advanced Functional Materials and Journal of Cleaner Production.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.