Adina Williams
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Alexis ConneauGuillaume LampleRuty RinottVeselin StoyanovHolger SchwenkSamuel BowmanDouwe KielaSamuel R. Bowman
- Topics
- Topic Modeling (22 papers)Natural Language Processing Techniques (20 papers)Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelCanada
In The Last Decade
Adina Williams
29 papers receiving 907 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Artificial Intelligence 849
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 284
- Information Systems 46
- Cognitive Neuroscience 44
- Sociology and Political Science 32
Countries citing papers authored by Adina Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Adina Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adina Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adina Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adina Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adina Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adina Williams. The network helps show where Adina Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adina Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adina Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adina Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adina Williams. Adina Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 98 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 88 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationsbreakdown → | 499 |
| 19 | Learning to parse from a semantic objective: It works. Is it syntax? | 8 |
| 20 | 27 |
About Adina Williams
Adina Williams is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, General Social Sciences and Cultural Studies, having authored 32 papers that have together received 971 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topic Modeling (22 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (20 papers) and Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (849 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (284 citations) and Health Informatics (13 citations). Adina Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alexis Conneau, Guillaume Lample, Ruty Rinott, Veselin Stoyanov, Holger Schwenk, Samuel Bowman, Douwe Kiela, Samuel R. Bowman, Candace Ross and Dieuwke Hupkes. Their work appears in journals such as Science Advances, Neuropsychologia and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.