Adam R. Navis

474 citations
11 papers · 353 indexed · h-index 6

Adam R. Navis

10 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Adam R. Navis
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Cell Biology 115
  • Aging 7
  • Molecular Biology 219
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 76
  • Genetics 41
Replace Fredericus Van Eeden with:
Fredericus Van Eeden United Kingdom
Abigail Gibson Australia
Erez Cohen United States
Gennadiy Tenin United Kingdom
Silja Burkhard Netherlands
Nilay Taneja United States
Kimiko Takebayashi‐Suzuki Japan
Amanda Ochoa‐Espinosa Switzerland
Sang‐Wook Cha United States
Joe W. Cross United Kingdom
Adam R. Navis relative to Fredericus Van Eeden United Kingdom Fredericus Van Eeden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Fredericus Van Eeden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam R. Navis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam R. Navis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam R. Navis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam R. Navis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam R. Navis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam R. Navis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam R. Navis. The network helps show where Adam R. Navis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Adam R. Navis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam R. Navis Line = papers co-authored together Adam R. Navis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 20175
2 201625
3 201540
4 201556
5 201592
6 201388
7
"Experiments on Embryonic Induction III. A Note on Inductions by Chick Primitive Streak Transplanted to the Rabbit Embryo" (1934), by Conrad Hal Waddington
20121
8
Joseph Needham (1900-1995)
20121
9
"Purification of a Nerve-Growth Promoting Protein from the Mouse Salivary Gland and its Neuro-Cytoxic Antiserum" (1960), by Stanley Cohen
20121
10 201043
11 20101

About Adam R. Navis

Adam R. Navis is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Condensed Matter Physics, Molecular Biology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (3 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (2 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (1 paper), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (1 paper) and Birth, Development, and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (115 citations), Aging (7 citations), Molecular Biology (219 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (76 citations) and Genetics (41 citations). Adam R. Navis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michel Bagnat, Lindsay Marjoram, Celeste M. Nelson, Ben D. Cox, Matthew Gemberling, Jingli Cao, Kenneth D. Poss, Amy L. Dickson, Ravi Karra and Keith E. Mostov. Their work appears in journals such as Development, Current Biology, Mammalian Genome, Developmental Biology and Current Opinion in Genetics & Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026