Adam Philip King
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- C. R. GallistelPeter E. LathamRobert V. McDonaldFuat BalcıEfstathios B. PapachristosDaniel GottliebMieczysław SzaleckiDavid Freestone
- Topics
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers)Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Visualized ExperimentsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of BehaviorBehavioural Processes
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Adam Philip King
12 papers receiving 606 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cognitive Neuroscience 407
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 184
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 108
- Social Psychology 81
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Philip King
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Philip King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Philip King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Philip King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Philip King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Philip King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Philip King. The network helps show where Adam Philip King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Philip King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Philip King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Philip King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Philip King. Adam Philip King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 155 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 82 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 154 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 128 |
About Adam Philip King
Adam Philip King is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (407 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (184 citations) and General Decision Sciences (26 citations). Adam Philip King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include C. R. Gallistel, Peter E. Latham, Robert V. McDonald, Fuat Balcı, Efstathios B. Papachristos, Daniel Gottlieb, Mieczysław Szalecki, David Freestone, Sara Cordes and Alan M. Daniel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Visualized Experiments, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior and Behavioural Processes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.