Kenneth C. Chelette

805 total citations
26 papers, 556 citations indexed

About

Kenneth C. Chelette is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Kenneth C. Chelette has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 556 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Neurology, 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Kenneth C. Chelette's work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (16 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (11 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers). Kenneth C. Chelette is often cited by papers focused on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (16 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (11 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers). Kenneth C. Chelette collaborates with scholars based in United States and Iran. Kenneth C. Chelette's co-authors include Lumy Sawaki, Mark Mennemeier, Timothy Kimbrell, John L. Dornhoffer, William J. Triggs, Cheryl Carrico, Twyla B. Bartel, Philip M. Westgate, Adam J. Woods and Jason Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Stroke and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Kenneth C. Chelette

25 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

Kenneth C. Chelette

NEURO

REHAB

Carlotta Casati Italy

Kei Saito Japan

Brent Tarver United States

Marco Antônio Marcolin Brazil

Yasuto Inukai Japan

Hosam Khalifa Egypt

Alex Martino Cinnera Italy

Francesca Cortese Italy

Mitsuhiro Masaki Japan

Anna Carolyna Gianlorenço Brazil

Carlotta Casati Italy

Kenneth C. Chelette

370 ×0.9

NEURO

153 ×0.7

REHAB

307 ×1.5

45 ×0.3

105 ×1.0

Citations per year, relative to Kenneth C. Chelette Kenneth C. Chelette (= 1×) peers Carlotta Casati

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth C. Chelette

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth C. Chelette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth C. Chelette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth C. Chelette more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth C. Chelette

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth C. Chelette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth C. Chelette. The network helps show where Kenneth C. Chelette may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth C. Chelette

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth C. Chelette. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth C. Chelette based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth C. Chelette. Kenneth C. Chelette is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Carrico, Cheryl, et al.. (2018). Nerve Stimulation Enhances Task-Oriented Training for Moderate-to-Severe Hemiparesis 3–12 Months After Stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 97(11). 808–815. 15 indexed citations

Gebodh, Nigel, Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Devin Adair, et al.. (2018). Inherent physiological artifacts in EEG during tDCS. NeuroImage. 185. 408–424. 28 indexed citations

Gebodh, Nigel, Devin Adair, Kenneth C. Chelette, et al.. (2017). Modulation of physiologic artifacts during concurrent tDCS and EEG. Brain stimulation. 10(2). 429–430. 2 indexed citations

Gebodh, Nigel, Devin Adair, Kenneth C. Chelette, et al.. (2017). Physiologic Artifacts When Combining EEG and tDCS. Brain stimulation. 10(4). e33–e33. 2 indexed citations

Carrico, Cheryl, et al.. (2016). Time configuration of combined neuromodulation and motor training after stroke: A proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabilitation. 39(3). 439–449. 19 indexed citations

Carrico, Cheryl, et al.. (2016). Randomized Trial of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation to Enhance Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy After Stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 95(6). 397–406. 36 indexed citations

Carrico, Cheryl, et al.. (2016). Nerve Stimulation Enhances Task-Oriented Training in Chronic, Severe Motor Deficit After Stroke. Stroke. 47(7). 1879–1884. 44 indexed citations

Carrico, Cheryl, et al.. (2016). Non-invasive brain stimulation and robot-assisted gait training after incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized pilot study. Neurorehabilitation. 38(1). 15–25. 49 indexed citations

Sheffer, Christine E., Mark Mennemeier, Reid D. Landes, et al.. (2013). Focal Electrical Stimulation as an Effective Sham Control for Active rTMS and Biofeedback Treatments. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 38(3). 171–176. 9 indexed citations

10.

Chelette, Kenneth C., et al.. (2013). Brain stimulation paired with novel locomotor training with robotic gait orthosis in chronic stroke: A feasibility study. Neurorehabilitation. 33(1). 67–76. 65 indexed citations

11.

Chelette, Kenneth C., et al.. (2012). Poster 20 Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Paired With a Novel Locomotor Training in Chronic Stroke: A Feasibility Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 93(10). e19–e20. 3 indexed citations

12.

Chelette, Kenneth C., et al.. (2012). Poster 22 Optimizing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Motor Recovery From Severe Post-Stroke Hemiparesis: Early Results From an Ongoing Clinical Trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 93(10). e20–e20. 3 indexed citations

13.

Woods, Adam J., et al.. (2011). Improvement in arousal, visual neglect, and perception of stimulus intensity following cold pressor stimulation. Neurocase. 18(2). 115–122. 12 indexed citations

14.

Philbeck, John W., et al.. (2011). Cold pressor stimulation diminishes P50 amplitude in normal subjects. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1 indexed citations

15.

Mennemeier, Mark, Kenneth C. Chelette, Twyla B. Bartel, et al.. (2011). Variable changes in PET activity before and after rTMS treatment for tinnitus. The Laryngoscope. 121(4). 815–822. 38 indexed citations

16.

Woods, Adam J., John W. Philbeck, Kenneth C. Chelette, et al.. (2011). Cold pressor stimulation diminishes P50 amplitude in normal subjects. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis. 71(3). 348–358. 5 indexed citations

17.

Mennemeier, Mark, William J. Triggs, Kenneth C. Chelette, et al.. (2009). Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation using electrical stimulation of the scalp. Brain stimulation. 2(3). 168–173. 61 indexed citations

18.

Mennemeier, Mark, Kenneth C. Chelette, Twyla B. Bartel, et al.. (2008). Maintenance Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Can Inhibit the Return of Tinnitus. The Laryngoscope. 118(7). 1228–1232. 29 indexed citations

19.

Smith, Jason, Mark Mennemeier, Twyla B. Bartel, et al.. (2007). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Tinnitus: A Pilot Study. The Laryngoscope. 117(3). 529–534. 86 indexed citations

20.

Richter, Gresham T., Mark Mennemeier, Twyla B. Bartel, et al.. (2006). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Tinnitus: A Case Study. The Laryngoscope. 116(10). 1867–1872. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact