Adam J. Walker

44 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Adam J. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Biological Psychiatry 312
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 164
  • Neurology 123
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 149
  • Pharmacology 110
Replace Bingjin Li with:
Bingjin Li China
Romain Colle France
Cinara Ludvig Gonçalves Brazil
Chiara C. Bortolasci Australia
Sho Moriguchi Japan
Adriano José Maia Chaves Filho Brazil
Laura Gray Australia
Rei Wake Japan
Tao Xue China
Mahmut Bulut Türkiye
Adam J. Walker relative to Bingjin Li China Bingjin Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Bingjin Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam J. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam J. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam J. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam J. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam J. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam J. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam J. Walker. The network helps show where Adam J. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam J. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam J. Walker Line = papers co-authored together Adam J. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017128
2 2017110
3 2019106
4 2018102
5 201980
6 201965
7 201663
8 202159
9 201749
10 201449
11 202345
12 201545
13 201634
14 201232
15 202030
16 201930
17 201828
18 202127
19 201924
20 202024

About Adam J. Walker

Adam J. Walker is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Molecular Biology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (17 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (312 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (164 citations), Neurology (123 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (149 citations) and Pharmacology (110 citations). Adam J. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Michael Berk, Gerwyn Morris, Basant K. Puri, Michaël Maes, André F. Carvalho, Ken Walder, Seetal Dodd, Bruno Agustini, Susannah J. Tye and Jane McGillivray. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Behavioural Brain Research, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Molecular Neurobiology and Translational Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact