Abel Silva‐Garcia
About
In The Last Decade
Abel Silva‐Garcia
6 papers receiving 377 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Organic Chemistry 168
- Genetics 158
- Molecular Biology 120
- Hematology 96
- Physiology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Abel Silva‐Garcia
This map shows the geographic impact of Abel Silva‐Garcia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abel Silva‐Garcia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abel Silva‐Garcia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Abel Silva‐Garcia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abel Silva‐Garcia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abel Silva‐Garcia. The network helps show where Abel Silva‐Garcia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Abel Silva‐Garcia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Abel Silva‐Garcia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Abel Silva‐Garcia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Abel Silva‐Garcia. Abel Silva‐Garcia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 184 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 98 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.