Abbe R. Gluck
About
In The Last Decade
Abbe R. Gluck
41 papers receiving 238 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Economics and Econometrics 107
- General Health Professions 65
- Political Science and International Relations 56
- Law 50
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 44
Countries citing papers authored by Abbe R. Gluck
This map shows the geographic impact of Abbe R. Gluck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abbe R. Gluck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abbe R. Gluck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Abbe R. Gluck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abbe R. Gluck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abbe R. Gluck. The network helps show where Abbe R. Gluck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Abbe R. Gluck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Abbe R. Gluck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Abbe R. Gluck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Abbe R. Gluck. Abbe R. Gluck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | The Congressional Bureaucracy | 4 |
| 4 | The Affordable Care Act's Litigation Decade | 1 |
| 5 | Affordable Care Act Entrenchment | 1 |
| 6 | What Is Federalism in Healthcare For? | 14 |
| 7 | What is Federalism in Health Care for | 14 |
| 8 | Congress, Statutory Interpretation, and the Failure of Formalism: The CBO Canon and Other Ways That Courts Can Improve on What They Are Already Trying to Do | 1 |
| 9 | Unorthodox Civil Procedure: Modern Multidistrict Litigation's Place in the Textbook Understandings of Procedure | 4 |
| 10 | The Ripple Effect Of ‘Leg-Reg’ on the Study of Legislation & Administrative Law in the Law School Curriculum | 1 |
| 11 | Imperfect Statutes, Imperfect Courts: Understanding Congress's Plan in the Era of Unorthodox Lawmaking | 1 |
| 12 | Our (National) Federalism | 3 |
| 13 | What 30 Years of Chevron Teach Us About the Rest of Statutory Interpretation | 1 |
| 14 | Statutory Interpretation from the Inside: Methods Appendix | 1 |
| 15 | The Federal Common Law of Statutory Interpretation: Erie for the Age of Statutes | 1 |
| 16 | Statutory Interpretation from the Inside--An Empirical Study of Congressional Drafting, Delegation, and the Canons: Part I | 7 |
| 17 | Statutory Interpretation from the Inside -- An Empirical Study of Congressional Drafting, Delegation and the Canons: Part I | 8 |
| 18 | Intrastatutory Federalism and Statutory Interpretation: State Implementation of Federal Law in Health Reform and Beyond | 5 |
| 19 | The States as Laboratories of Statutory Interpretation: Methodological Consensus and the New Modified Textualism | 7 |
| 20 | Intersystemic Statutory Interpretation: Methodology as ‘Law’ and the Erie Doctrine | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.