Otis W. Brawley
- Oncology top 0.2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 0.2%
- Cancer Research top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert A. SmithDurado BrooksRichard C. WenderDebbie SaslowDeana Manassaram‐BaptisteStacey A. FedewaVilma CokkinidesKimberly Andrews
- Topics
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (39 papers)Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (27 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (26 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaFinland
In The Last Decade
Otis W. Brawley
126 papers receiving 11.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
- Oncology 5.2k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 4.1k
- Cancer Research 1.8k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.7k
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by Otis W. Brawley
This map shows the geographic impact of Otis W. Brawley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otis W. Brawley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otis W. Brawley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Otis W. Brawley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otis W. Brawley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otis W. Brawley. The network helps show where Otis W. Brawley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Otis W. Brawley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Otis W. Brawley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Otis W. Brawley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Otis W. Brawley. Otis W. Brawley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 233 | |
| 6 | 91 | |
| 7 | 75 | |
| 8 | 336 | |
| 9 | 165 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 54 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | 158 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 72 |
About Otis W. Brawley
Otis W. Brawley is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 128 papers that have together received 12.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (39 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (27 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (5.2k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4.1k citations) and Cancer Research (1.8k citations). Otis W. Brawley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Smith, Durado Brooks, Richard C. Wender, Debbie Saslow, Deana Manassaram‐Baptiste, Stacey A. Fedewa, Vilma Cokkinides, Kimberly Andrews, William F. Anderson and Nilanjan Chatterjee. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.