Dena Schulman‐Green

5.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
104 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Dena Schulman‐Green is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Dena Schulman‐Green has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 29 papers in General Health Professions and 26 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Dena Schulman‐Green's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (53 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (21 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (21 papers). Dena Schulman‐Green is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (53 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (21 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (21 papers). Dena Schulman‐Green collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Dena Schulman‐Green's co-authors include Ruth McCorkle, Elizabeth Ercolano, Mark Lazenby, Robin Whittemore, Sarah S. Jaser, Kate Lorig, Edward H. Wagner, Lynne S. Schilling, Margaret Grey and Nancy R. Reynolds and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

In The Last Decade

Dena Schulman‐Green

95 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness

2011 720 citations Ruth McCorkle, Elizabeth Ercolano et al. profile →
Processes of Self‐Management in Chronic Illness

2012 476 citations Dena Schulman‐Green, Sarah S. Jaser et al. Journal of Nursing Scholarship profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dena Schulman‐Green United States	29	1.4k	1.2k	867	785	523	104	3.6k
Lisa R. Shugarman United States	30	1.6k 1.1×	926 0.7×	398 0.5×	473 0.6×	309 0.6×	73	4.3k
Kathleen Ell United States	34	790 0.6×	1.3k 1.0×	1.3k 1.5×	544 0.7×	407 0.8×	80	3.8k
Carla Parry United States	25	1.0k 0.7×	1.9k 1.5×	1.0k 1.2×	1.1k 1.4×	138 0.3×	36	5.0k
Karen Schumacher United States	34	1.5k 1.0×	1.3k 1.1×	922 1.1×	1.1k 1.3×	152 0.3×	71	4.9k
Tim Luckett Australia	34	1.8k 1.3×	1.0k 0.8×	1.0k 1.2×	953 1.2×	84 0.2×	170	4.1k
Yael Schenker United States	35	2.6k 1.9×	1.9k 1.5×	761 0.9×	1.2k 1.5×	103 0.2×	142	4.6k
Mariko Carey Australia	35	1.5k 1.1×	1.2k 1.0×	1.6k 1.8×	904 1.2×	90 0.2×	195	4.1k
Sally H. Rankin United States	30	442 0.3×	1.0k 0.8×	308 0.4×	405 0.5×	281 0.5×	91	3.0k
Konstadina Griva Singapore	36	717 0.5×	721 0.6×	280 0.3×	421 0.5×	396 0.8×	144	4.0k
Lara Traeger United States	39	2.1k 1.5×	927 0.7×	2.4k 2.8×	1.7k 2.2×	109 0.2×	196	5.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Dena Schulman‐Green

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dena Schulman‐Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dena Schulman‐Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dena Schulman‐Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dena Schulman‐Green

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dena Schulman‐Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dena Schulman‐Green. The network helps show where Dena Schulman‐Green may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dena Schulman‐Green

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dena Schulman‐Green. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dena Schulman‐Green based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dena Schulman‐Green. Dena Schulman‐Green is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Meghani, Salimah H., Kim Mooney‐Doyle, Amber E. Barnato, et al.. (2024). Lessons Learned Establishing the Palliative Care Research Cooperative's Qualitative Data Repository. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 68(3). 308–318.

Feder, Shelli L., et al.. (2023). Development of the Palliative Care Law and Policy GPS to Assess National Policies in Palliative Care. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 26(12). 1698–1701.

Weber, Ashley, Tamilyn Bakas, Dena Schulman‐Green, et al.. (2023). Family Management Skills Reported by Parents of Preterm Infants in the NICU Using the Self- and Family Management Framework (SFMF). Advances in Neonatal Care. 24(2). 119–131. 2 indexed citations

Chae, Sena, et al.. (2022). Linking nursing outcomes classification to the self‐ and family management framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 79(2). 832–849. 3 indexed citations

Park, Jae Hyung, et al.. (2022). Use of the Self- and Family Management Framework in quantitative studies. Nursing Outlook. 71(1). 101890–101890. 2 indexed citations

Pei, Yaolin, et al.. (2022). Decision Aid Interventions for Family Caregivers of Persons With Advanced Dementia in Decision-Making About Feeding Options: A Scoping Review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 23(12). 1927.e1–1927.e6. 5 indexed citations

Travers, Jasmine, et al.. (2022). Demystifying the National Institutes of Health diversity supplement: Mentee and mentor experiences and recommendations. Nursing Outlook. 70(6). 856–865. 2 indexed citations

Schulman‐Green, Dena, et al.. (2021). Use of the self- and family management framework and implications for further development. Nursing Outlook. 69(6). 991–1020. 9 indexed citations

Puglisi, Lisa B., Jenerius A. Aminawung, Colleen Gallagher, et al.. (2021). Incarceration and Cancer-Related Outcomes (ICRO) study protocol: using a mixed-methods approach to investigate the role of incarceration on cancer incidence, mortality and quality of care. BMJ Open. 11(5). e048863–e048863. 10 indexed citations

10.

Starkweather, Angela, Xiaomei Cong, Wanli Xu, et al.. (2021). A Descriptive Survey Study of Patient Needs and Preferences for Cancer Pain Self-Management Support. Oncology nursing forum. 49(1). 46–57. 1 indexed citations

11.

Vasunilashorn, Sarinnapha M., Dena Schulman‐Green, Douglas Tommet, et al.. (2020). New Delirium Severity Indicators: Generation and Internal Validation in the Better Assessment of Illness (BASIL) Study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. 49(1). 77–90. 6 indexed citations

12.

Unroe, Kathleen T., Katherine Ast, Elizabeth Chuang, et al.. (2017). The Implementation of Measuring What Matters in Research and Practice: Series Commentary. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 54(5). 772–775. 6 indexed citations

13.

Garner, Kimberly K., Patricia M. Dubbert, Shelly Lensing, et al.. (2016). Concordance Between Veterans' Self-Report and Documentation of Surrogate Decision Makers: Implications for Quality Measurement. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 53(1). 1–4. 8 indexed citations

14.

Grudzen, Corita R., Jonathan Steinberg, Joanna M. Ortiz, et al.. (2016). Concordance of Advance Care Plans With Inpatient Directives in the Electronic Medical Record for Older Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 51(4). 647–651. 39 indexed citations

15.

Gramling, Robert, Susan Ladwig, Jenica Cimino, et al.. (2015). Feeling Heard and Understood: A Patient-Reported Quality Measure for the Inpatient Palliative Care Setting. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 51(2). 150–154. 62 indexed citations

16.

Ellman, Matthew S., et al.. (2012). Using Online Learning and Interactive Simulation To Teach Spiritual and Cultural Aspects of Palliative Care to Interprofessional Students. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 15(11). 1240–1247. 71 indexed citations

17.

Schulman‐Green, Dena, Sarah S. Jaser, Faith Martin, et al.. (2012). Processes of Self‐Management in Chronic Illness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 44(2). 136–144. 476 indexed citations breakdown →

18.

Schulman‐Green, Dena, Emily Cherlin, Ruth McCorkle, et al.. (2009). Benefits and Challenges in Use of a Standardized Symptom Assessment Instrument in Hospice. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 13(2). 155–159. 17 indexed citations

19.

Schulman‐Green, Dena, Elizabeth Ercolano, Michael F. Dowd, Peter E. Schwartz, & Ruth McCorkle. (2008). Quality of life among women after surgery for ovarian cancer. Palliative & Supportive Care. 6(3). 239–247. 35 indexed citations

20.

Xue, Ying, et al.. (2007). Pain Attitudes and Knowledge Among RNs, Pharmacists, and Physicians on an Inpatient Oncology Service. Clinical journal of oncology nursing. 11(5). 687–695. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact