A. W. de Vries
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 5%
- Co-authors
- M.P. de LoozeLeonard O’SullivanTjaša KermavnarFrank KrauseJaap H. van DieënSabine VerschuerenIlse JonkersSaskia Baltrusch
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers)Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (5 papers)Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- RehabilitationMedical Laboratory TechnologyPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumIreland
In The Last Decade
A. W. de Vries
11 papers receiving 479 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Biomedical Engineering 263
- Rehabilitation 190
- Pharmacology 135
- Social Psychology 69
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 56
Countries citing papers authored by A. W. de Vries
This map shows the geographic impact of A. W. de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. W. de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. W. de Vries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. W. de Vries
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. W. de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. W. de Vries. The network helps show where A. W. de Vries may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. W. de Vries
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. W. de Vries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. W. de Vries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. W. de Vries. A. W. de Vries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 56 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 170 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | Genetic aspects of meat quality in poultry. | 2 |
About A. W. de Vries
A. W. de Vries is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (5 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (190 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (23 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (56 citations). A. W. de Vries has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include M.P. de Looze, Leonard O’Sullivan, Tjaša Kermavnar, Frank Krause, Jaap H. van Dieën, Sabine Verschueren, Ilse Jonkers, Saskia Baltrusch, Wietse van Dijk and Idsart Kingma. Their work appears in journals such as Gait & Posture, Ergonomics and Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.