A. Stankov

564 total citations
11 papers, 269 citations indexed

About

A. Stankov is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Stankov has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 269 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Instrumentation and 1 paper in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in A. Stankov's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (8 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (6 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers). A. Stankov is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (8 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (6 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers). A. Stankov collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Austria. A. Stankov's co-authors include G. Handler, F. Comerón, A. Pasquali, E. De Filippis, R. Gredel, G. Rodighiero, M. C. Gálvez-Ortiz, Belén López Martí, V. Stanishev and Tra‐Mi Ho and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

A. Stankov

9 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. Stankov Netherlands	6	260	88	22	20	14	11	269
Jean‐François Lestrade France	10	275 1.1×	36 0.4×	25 1.1×	29 1.4×	16 1.1×	25	287
M. Geffert Germany	10	240 0.9×	96 1.1×	28 1.3×	19 0.9×	10 0.7×	38	243
W. A. Dziembowski Poland	6	269 1.0×	137 1.6×	22 1.0×	9 0.5×	8 0.6×	19	278
Catherine Lovekin Canada	9	235 0.9×	95 1.1×	30 1.4×	51 2.5×	13 0.9×	24	274
P. Neunteufel Germany	13	388 1.5×	65 0.7×	15 0.7×	34 1.7×	6 0.4×	21	402
Tyler M. Heintz United States	5	344 1.3×	185 2.1×	21 1.0×	10 0.5×	25 1.8×	6	368
M. H. Slovak United States	9	239 0.9×	61 0.7×	22 1.0×	19 0.9×	9 0.6×	21	252
J.-F. Lestrade France	10	307 1.2×	35 0.4×	25 1.1×	30 1.5×	10 0.7×	22	324
Fahri Aliçavuş Türkiye	7	279 1.1×	131 1.5×	34 1.5×	15 0.8×	4 0.3×	24	301
S. Evren Türkiye	11	405 1.6×	124 1.4×	30 1.4×	15 0.8×	7 0.5×	61	415

Countries citing papers authored by A. Stankov

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Stankov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Stankov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Stankov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Stankov

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Stankov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Stankov. The network helps show where A. Stankov may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Stankov

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Stankov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Stankov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Stankov. A. Stankov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Tommasi, Leonardo, Demetrio Labate, Claudio Pernechele, et al.. (2023). Design of the EnVisS instrument optical head. 114. 97–97.

2.

Clark, Kenneth, A. Stankov, R. T. Pappalardo, et al.. (2009). The Europa Jupiter System Mission. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 13998. 1 indexed citations

3.

Oosterbroek, T., I. Cognard, Aaron Golden, et al.. (2008). Simultaneous absolute timing of the Crab pulsar at radio and optical wavelengths. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 488(1). 271–277. 25 indexed citations

4.

Ho, Tra‐Mi, R. Schulz, C. Erd, et al.. (2007). 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-B observed from the optical ground station. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 477(1). 299–308. 3 indexed citations

5.

Hartog, R. den, Olivier Absil, P. Gondoin, et al.. (2005). The prospects of detecting exo-planets with the Ground-based European Nulling Interferometer Experiment (GENIE). Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 1(C200). 233–239. 1 indexed citations

6.

Stankov, A. & G. Handler. (2005). Catalog of Galactic β Cephei Stars. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 158(2). 193–216. 135 indexed citations

7.

Stankov, A., et al.. (2003). Abundances and radial velocity analysis of BW Vulpeculae. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 408(3). 1077–1086. 6 indexed citations

8.

Comerón, F., A. Pasquali, G. Rodighiero, et al.. (2002). On the massive star contents of Cygnus OB2. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 389(3). 874–888. 76 indexed citations

9.

Stankov, A., G. Handler, M. Hempel, & P. Mittermayer. (2002). β Cephei and new pulsating stars in NGC 4755. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 336(1). 189–196. 7 indexed citations

10.

Breger, M., R. Garrido, G. Handler, et al.. (2002). 29 frequencies for the δ Scuti variable BI CMi: the 1997–2000 multisite campaigns. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 329(3). 531–542. 15 indexed citations

11.

Stankov, A., et al.. (1998). CCD Photometry of the δ Scuti star FG Virginis During the 1995 Multi-Site Campaign. Astrophysics and Space Science. 260(3). 281–290.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact