Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Compound semiconductor radiation detectors
2004431 citationsAlan Owens, A. PeacockNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipmentprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Peacock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Peacock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Peacock more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Peacock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Peacock. The network helps show where A. Peacock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Peacock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Peacock.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Peacock based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. Peacock. A. Peacock is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fraser, G. W., J. S. Heslop‐Harrison, Trude Schwarzacher, et al.. (2006). Optical fluorescence of biological samples using STJs. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 559(2). 782–784.6 indexed citations
2.
Falkner, P., et al.. (2004). The Interstellar Heliopause Probe. ESASP. 35. 11–16.6 indexed citations
3.
Owens, Alan, et al.. (2003). Optical characterization of ultra‐pure GaAs. Physica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics. 1024–1027.10 indexed citations
4.
Bruijne, J. H. J. de, A. P. Reynolds, M. A. C. Perryman, et al.. (2002). Direct determination of quasar redshifts. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology).12 indexed citations
Lumb, David H., et al.. (1996). <title>X-ray Multimirror Mission: an overview</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2808. 326–337.22 indexed citations
14.
Peacock, A., et al.. (1993). Progress in the long term testing of an all dielectric self supporting cable for power system use. 3.11 indexed citations
15.
White, N. E. & A. Peacock. (1988). The EXOSAT observatory. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana. 59. 7–29.1 indexed citations
16.
Manzo, G., A. Peacock, B. G. Taylor, et al.. (1983). Observations of the iron emission lines in the X-ray spectrum of the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A.. 122. 124–128.
17.
Andresen, Reimer, et al.. (1982). The European X-ray Observatory Satellite - Exosat.. 6(1). 1–19.
18.
Andresen, Reimer, et al.. (1982). The European X-ray observatory Exosat - its mission and scientific instruments.. 31. 20–33.1 indexed citations
19.
Taylor, B. G., et al.. (1981). The Exosat mission. Space Science Reviews. 30(1-4). 479–494.39 indexed citations
20.
Peacock, A.. (1980). The extreme-ultraviolet and soft X-ray sky-survey project EXUV.. 4(1). 31–40.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.