A. Richard Chamberlin
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Spectroscopy top 2%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- John M. HumphreyRichard J. BridgesJenny BainPeter O. KrutzikJohn Y. L. ChungCarl W. CotmanMatthew HartAmy Lew
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (26 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (24 papers)Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTaiwanGermany
In The Last Decade
A. Richard Chamberlin
121 papers receiving 6.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Organic Chemistry 3.3k
- Molecular Biology 3.3k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 947
- Spectroscopy 496
- Inorganic Chemistry 471
Countries citing papers authored by A. Richard Chamberlin
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Richard Chamberlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Richard Chamberlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Richard Chamberlin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. Richard Chamberlin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Richard Chamberlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Richard Chamberlin. The network helps show where A. Richard Chamberlin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Richard Chamberlin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Richard Chamberlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Richard Chamberlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Richard Chamberlin. A. Richard Chamberlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | 46 | |
| 5 | 180 | |
| 6 | 63 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 73 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 67 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 66 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 130 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About A. Richard Chamberlin
A. Richard Chamberlin is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 122 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (26 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (24 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (3.3k citations), Biochemistry (444 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (947 citations). A. Richard Chamberlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John M. Humphrey, Richard J. Bridges, Jenny Bain, Peter O. Krutzik, John Y. L. Chung, Carl W. Cotman, Matthew Hart, Richard J. Bridges, Amy Lew and James B. Aggen. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.