This map shows the geographic impact of A. O. Fanimo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. O. Fanimo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. O. Fanimo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. O. Fanimo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. O. Fanimo. The network helps show where A. O. Fanimo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. O. Fanimo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. O. Fanimo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. O. Fanimo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. O. Fanimo. A. O. Fanimo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fanimo, A. O., et al.. (2016). Feed value of enzyme supplemented cassava leaf meal and shrimp meal in pigs. Bulletin of animal health and production in Africa. 64(1). 69–82.
3.
Fanimo, A. O., et al.. (2013). Cassava root peel as a replacement for maize in diets for growing pigs: effects on energy and nutrient digestibility, performance and carcass characteristics. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 114(2). 159–166.3 indexed citations
Fanimo, A. O., et al.. (2006). Response of broiler chicken to raw and processed malted sorghum sprout..
7.
Sogunle, O. M., et al.. (2006). Age-related carcass component changes in cockerels..2 indexed citations
8.
Sogunle, O. M., et al.. (2006). The performance of broiler chicks fed on diets containing rice offal and cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale Linn) reject meal. Archivos de Zootecnia. 55(211). 273–280.3 indexed citations
9.
Fanimo, A. O., et al.. (2006). Response of broiler chickens to cassava peel and maize offal in cashewnut meal-based diets. Archivos de Zootecnia. 55(211). 301–304.14 indexed citations
Fanimo, A. O., et al.. (2004). Feeding value of shrimp meal for growing pigs. Archivos de Zootecnia. 53(201). 77–85.12 indexed citations
12.
Oduguwa, O. O., et al.. (2004). The feeding value of sun-dried shrimp waste-meal based diets for starter and finisher broilers. Archivos de Zootecnia. 53(201). 87–90.19 indexed citations
13.
Oduguwa, O. O., et al.. (2001). Response of broiler chickens to inorganic sulphur compounds used as partial substitutes for synthetic methionine 66. Tropical Agriculture. 78(1). 66–70.
Oduguwa, O. O., et al.. (2000). Potency of two proprietary micronutrient premixesfor broiler chickens at marginally deficientprotein contents. Archivos de Zootecnia. 49(188). 433–444.4 indexed citations
16.
Oduguwa, O. O., et al.. (2000). Utilisation of raw and autoclaved whole pods of Samanea saman (Jacq Merril) by the domestic rabbit.. Tropical Agriculture. 77(3). 194–198.4 indexed citations
Onifade, A.A., et al.. (1998). Replacement value of cashew nutmeal for groundnut-cake in pullet diets: Effect on pre-laying performance and serum biochemical indices. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 68(2). 197–199.9 indexed citations
19.
Fanimo, A. O., et al.. (1996). FEEDING VALUE OF CHICKEN OFFAL-MEAL AS REPLACEMENT FOR FISHMEAL IN RATIONS FOR EARLY-WEANED PIGS. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 66(2). 173–176.1 indexed citations
20.
Fanimo, A. O., et al.. (1996). Substitution of shrimp waste meal for fish meal in broiler chicken rations. Tropical Agriculture. 73(3). 201–205.31 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.