Jonathan R. Howell

1.4k total citations
56 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Jonathan R. Howell is a scholar working on Surgery, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan R. Howell has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jonathan R. Howell's work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (48 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (40 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (33 papers). Jonathan R. Howell is often cited by papers focused on Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (48 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (40 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (33 papers). Jonathan R. Howell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Jonathan R. Howell's co-authors include M. J. W. Hubble, Sarah L. Whitehouse, A. John Timperley, Clivе P. Duncan, Graham A. Gie, Matthew Wilson, Bassam A. Masri, A. John Timperley, Donald S. Garbuz and Hussain Kazi and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan R. Howell

51 papers receiving 984 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan R. Howell United Kingdom 19 973 39 29 18 11 56 1.0k
Stanley H. Dysart United States 8 689 0.7× 23 0.6× 33 1.1× 20 1.1× 36 3.3× 10 723
Andrew G. Yun United States 13 434 0.4× 68 1.7× 8 0.3× 13 0.7× 7 0.6× 31 454
Jomar Klaksvik Norway 13 452 0.5× 83 2.1× 30 1.0× 15 0.8× 4 0.4× 38 473
Johan K rrholm Sweden 9 769 0.8× 93 2.4× 15 0.5× 20 1.1× 18 1.6× 10 812
Charalampos Karagkevrekis United Kingdom 6 330 0.3× 31 0.8× 8 0.3× 26 1.4× 6 0.5× 7 396
Erin L. Ruh United States 13 1.3k 1.3× 29 0.7× 23 0.8× 7 0.4× 5 0.5× 15 1.3k
Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker United States 15 897 0.9× 11 0.3× 19 0.7× 3 0.2× 5 0.5× 40 925
James Fletcher United Kingdom 10 214 0.2× 143 3.7× 9 0.3× 13 0.7× 15 1.4× 30 260
Kim C Bertin United States 11 1.1k 1.1× 77 2.0× 40 1.4× 36 2.0× 16 1.1k
Manish Dastane United States 9 947 1.0× 13 0.3× 44 1.5× 18 1.0× 1 0.1× 9 961

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan R. Howell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan R. Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan R. Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan R. Howell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan R. Howell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan R. Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan R. Howell. The network helps show where Jonathan R. Howell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan R. Howell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan R. Howell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan R. Howell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan R. Howell. Jonathan R. Howell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Walton, Thomas J., Sarah L. Whitehouse, Alastair Ross, et al.. (2025). Intraoperative Cell Salvage for Revision Hip Arthroplasty. JBJS Open Access. 10(3).
2.
Nandra, Rajpal, Ian Carluke, Paul Partington, et al.. (2024). Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements with dual-mobility bearings and acetabular component retention. Bone & Joint Open. 5(6). 514–523. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gill, Kathryn, et al.. (2023). Culture, diversity and inclusion: a survey of British Hip Society members. BMJ Open Quality. 12(4). e002432–e002432. 2 indexed citations
4.
Walton, Thomas J., et al.. (2023). Intraoperative cell salvage in revision hip arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal. 105-B(10). 1038–1044. 2 indexed citations
5.
Wilson, Matthew, et al.. (2023). Mixed manufacturer dual mobility bearing and the Exeter V40 Stem: is it safe? Short-term results in primary and revision hip replacement. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. 89(2). 340–347. 1 indexed citations
6.
Springer, Bryan D., M. J. W. Hubble, Jonathan R. Howell, & Joseph T. Moskal. (2023). Cemented Femoral Stem Fixation: Back to the Future. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 38(7). S38–S44. 12 indexed citations
7.
Whitehouse, Sarah L., et al.. (2020). B2 or not B2? That is the question: a review of periprosthetic fractures around cemented taper-slip femoral components. The Bone & Joint Journal. 103-B(1). 71–78. 29 indexed citations
8.
Hubble, M. J. W., et al.. (2019). The Exeter Short Revision Stem for Cement-in-Cement Femoral Revision: A Five to Twelve Year Review. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 34(7). S297–S301. 15 indexed citations
9.
Howell, Jonathan R., et al.. (2019). Long-Term Survival of the Cemented Exeter Universal Stem in Patients 50 Years and Younger: An Update on 130 Hips. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 35(4). 1042–1047. 28 indexed citations
10.
Squires, B., et al.. (2018). THE EXETER UNIVERSAL HIP REPLACEMENT FOR THE YOUNG PATIENT: 10 TO 17 YEARS FOLLOW UP. 537–537.
11.
12.
Howell, Jonathan R., Mats Rooth, & Michael Wagner. (2017). Acoustic classification of focus: On the web and in the lab. Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology. 8(1). 16–16.
13.
Bolland, B.J.R.F., Matthew Wilson, Jonathan R. Howell, et al.. (2016). An Analysis of Reported Cases of Fracture of the Universal Exeter Femoral Stem Prosthesis. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 32(4). 1318–1322. 21 indexed citations
14.
Petheram, Timothy & Jonathan R. Howell. (2014). The Exeter method—acetabular impaction grafting with cemented reimplantation. Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie. 26(2). 114–125. 4 indexed citations
15.
Wilson, Matthew, Sarah L. Whitehouse, Jonathan R. Howell, et al.. (2013). The Results of Acetabular Impaction Grafting in 129 Primary Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasties. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 28(8). 1394–1400. 16 indexed citations
16.
Hubble, M. J. W., et al.. (2009). Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1 indexed citations
17.
Howell, Jonathan R., Min Xu, Clivе P. Duncan, Bassam A. Masri, & Donald S. Garbuz. (2008). A Comparison Between Patient Recall and Concurrent Measurement of Preoperative Quality of Life Outcome in Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 23(6). 843–849. 40 indexed citations
18.
Vincze, Markus, Michael Zillich, Wolfgang Ponweiser, et al.. (2008). Integrated vision system for the semantic interpretation of activities where a person handles objects. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 113(6). 682–692. 10 indexed citations
19.
Howell, Jonathan R., Donald S. Garbuz, & Clivе P. Duncan. (2004). Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 35(2). 107–118. 50 indexed citations
20.
Hooper, R. M., et al.. (1999). Fretting wear of total hip replacement femoral systems. 4. 121–126. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stanley H. Dysart Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew G. Yun Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jomar Klaksvik Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Johan K rrholm Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charalampos Karagkevrekis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erin L. Ruh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James Fletcher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kim C Bertin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Manish Dastane
Rankless by CCL
2026