A. Huke

989 total citations
36 papers, 670 citations indexed

About

A. Huke is a scholar working on Radiation, Geochemistry and Petrology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Huke has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 670 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Radiation, 15 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology and 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in A. Huke's work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (20 papers), Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions (15 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (7 papers). A. Huke is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear Physics and Applications (20 papers), Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions (15 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (7 papers). A. Huke collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Poland and Canada. A. Huke's co-authors include K. Czerski, P. Heide, G. Ruprecht, G. Ruprecht, Daniel Weißbach, Stephan Gottlieb, Ahmed Faeq Hussein, Andreas Biller, M. Hoeft and A. I. Kilić and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Energy and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

A. Huke

34 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. Huke Germany	12	284	224	181	174	166	36	670
R.P. Taleyarkhan United States	14	404 1.4×	121 0.5×	73 0.4×	27 0.2×	11 0.1×	99	935
A. C. Mignerey United States	12	53 0.2×	41 0.2×	66 0.4×	191 1.1×	23 0.1×	28	722
M. Hainbuchner France	9	80 0.3×	50 0.2×	49 0.3×	117 0.7×	5 0.0×	10	680
M. Bogovać Croatia	12	210 0.7×	21 0.1×	131 0.7×	218 1.3×	3 0.0×	32	659
C. Cuesta Spain	10	122 0.4×	19 0.1×	83 0.5×	221 1.3×	14 0.1×	40	393
Koichi Takamiya Japan	13	253 0.9×	11 0.0×	44 0.2×	111 0.6×	9 0.1×	82	646
G. De Geronimo United States	7	136 0.5×	40 0.2×	73 0.4×	29 0.2×	6 0.0×	19	431
R. Medenwaldt Denmark	14	194 0.7×	34 0.2×	93 0.5×	78 0.4×	6 0.0×	26	440
B. S. Nielsen Canada	9	65 0.2×	3 0.0×	131 0.7×	171 1.0×	31 0.2×	26	448
Richard E. Faw United States	14	256 0.9×	8 0.0×	26 0.1×	24 0.1×	9 0.1×	54	763

Countries citing papers authored by A. Huke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Huke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Huke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Huke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Huke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Huke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Huke. The network helps show where A. Huke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Huke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Huke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Huke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Huke. A. Huke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Czerski, K., et al.. (2024). Renewable Distillation of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Processes. 12(11). 2512–2512.

Czerski, K., et al.. (2023). Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from NdFeB Magnets by Chlorination and Distillation. Processes. 11(2). 577–577. 9 indexed citations

Czerski, K., et al.. (2020). New Methods for Nuclear Waste Treatment of the Dual Fluid Reactor Concept. Acta Physica Polonica B. 51(3). 893–893. 1 indexed citations

Weißbach, Daniel, et al.. (2019). Determination of the liquid eutectic metal fuel dual fluid reactor (DFRm) design – steady state calculations. International Journal of Energy Research. 43(8). 3692–3701. 11 indexed citations

Czerski, K., Marcin Kaczmarski, Daniel Weißbach, et al.. (2018). Electron Screening Effect in Nuclear Reactions in Metallic and Gaseous Targets. Acta Physica Polonica B. 49(3). 675–675. 2 indexed citations

Kaczmarski, Marcin, K. Czerski, Daniel Weißbach, et al.. (2017). Threshold Resonance Contribution to the Thick Target $^2$H$(d,p)^3$H Reaction Yield. Acta Physica Polonica B. 48(3). 489–489. 3 indexed citations

Czerski, K., Daniel Weißbach, A. I. Kilić, et al.. (2016). Screening and resonance enhancements of the ² H(d, p) ³ H reaction yield in metallic environments. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 113(2). 22001–22001. 22 indexed citations

Huke, A., G. Ruprecht, Daniel Weißbach, et al.. (2015). The Dual Fluid Reactor – A novel concept for a fast nuclear reactor of high efficiency. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 80. 225–235. 47 indexed citations

Weißbach, Daniel, G. Ruprecht, A. Huke, et al.. (2014). Reply on “Comments on ‘Energy intensities, EROIs (energy returned on invested), and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants’ – Making clear of quite some confusion”. Energy. 68. 1004–1006. 8 indexed citations

10.

Kaczmarski, Marcin, A. I. Kilić, K. Czerski, et al.. (2014). New Accelerator Facility for Measurements of Nuclear Reactions at Energies Below 1 keV. Acta Physica Polonica B. 45(2). 509–509. 8 indexed citations

11.

Ruprecht, G., et al.. (2013). Energy intensities, EROIs, and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants. 9 indexed citations

12.

Czerski, K., et al.. (2009). Dynamic Electron Screening in Nuclear Reactions and Alpha Decays. Acta Physica Polonica B. 40(3). 903. 4 indexed citations

13.

Huke, A., K. Czerski, & P. Heide. (2007). Measurement of the enhanced screening effect of the d + d reactions in metals. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 256(2). 599–618. 26 indexed citations

14.

Huke, A., et al.. (2006). Evidence for a host-material dependence of the n/p branching ratio of low-energy d+d reactions within metallic environments. The European Physical Journal A. 27(S1). 187–192. 6 indexed citations

15.

Czerski, K., A. Huke, P. Heide, & G. Ruprecht. (2006). Experimental and theoretical screening energies for the 2H(d, p)3H reaction in metallic environments. The European Physical Journal A. 27(S1). 83–88. 36 indexed citations

16.

Huke, A., K. Czerski, & P. Heide. (2006). ACCELERATOR EXPERIMENTS AND THEORETICAL MODELS FOR THE ELECTRON SCREENING EFFECT IN METALLIC ENVIRONMENTS. 194–209. 1 indexed citations

17.

Czerski, K., A. Huke, P. Heide, & G. Ruprecht. (2004). The ² H(d,p) ³ H reaction in metallic media at very low energies. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 68(3). 363–369. 49 indexed citations

18.

Czerski, K., A. Huke, & P. Heide. (2003). d+d fusion under astrophysical pycnoreaction conditions. Nuclear Physics A. 719. C52–C56. 3 indexed citations

19.

Huke, A.. (2002). Die Deuteronen-Fusionsreaktionen in Metallen. DepositOnce. 6 indexed citations

20.

Czerski, K., A. Huke, P. Heide, & G. Schiwietz. (2002). Solid-state effects in d+d fusion reactions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 193(1-4). 183–187. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact