A. Hogenbirk

581 total citations
26 papers, 341 citations indexed

About

A. Hogenbirk is a scholar working on Radiation, Aerospace Engineering and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Hogenbirk has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 341 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Radiation, 15 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 12 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in A. Hogenbirk's work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (14 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (14 papers) and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (6 papers). A. Hogenbirk is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (14 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (14 papers) and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (6 papers). A. Hogenbirk collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and Japan. A. Hogenbirk's co-authors include S.C. van der Marck, A. J. Koning, D. Rochman, E.E. Bende, J.L. Kloosterman, H. van Dam, H.P. Blok, W. Van der Zee, M.N. Harakeh and F. Jansen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physics Letters B and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

In The Last Decade

A. Hogenbirk

24 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. Hogenbirk Netherlands	10	232	189	182	88	27	26	341
Martyn T Swinhoe United States	12	234 1.0×	137 0.7×	389 2.1×	87 1.0×	24 0.9×	87	471
T.R. England United States	9	280 1.2×	147 0.8×	239 1.3×	146 1.7×	20 0.7×	29	369
D. Ridikas France	12	210 0.9×	145 0.8×	189 1.0×	134 1.5×	50 1.9×	48	370
F. Damian France	8	400 1.7×	316 1.7×	270 1.5×	28 0.3×	38 1.4×	19	448
Michael L Fensin United States	8	145 0.6×	132 0.7×	159 0.9×	30 0.3×	23 0.9×	24	267
W. Mannhart Germany	11	199 0.9×	85 0.4×	306 1.7×	137 1.6×	6 0.2×	30	353
Ane Håkansson Sweden	12	239 1.0×	137 0.7×	338 1.9×	230 2.6×	27 1.0×	56	544
P. Grimm Switzerland	11	254 1.1×	216 1.1×	135 0.7×	115 1.3×	76 2.8×	42	372
G. Imel United States	10	147 0.6×	92 0.5×	138 0.8×	25 0.3×	11 0.4×	38	222
D. Bernard France	13	409 1.8×	350 1.9×	341 1.9×	126 1.4×	7 0.3×	88	573

Countries citing papers authored by A. Hogenbirk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Hogenbirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Hogenbirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Hogenbirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Hogenbirk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Hogenbirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Hogenbirk. The network helps show where A. Hogenbirk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Hogenbirk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Hogenbirk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Hogenbirk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Hogenbirk. A. Hogenbirk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hogenbirk, A., et al.. (2011). Dose rates in ITER maintenance areas: How to achieve acceptable values. Fusion Engineering and Design. 86(6-8). 1345–1350. 2 indexed citations

Rochman, D., et al.. (2011). Nuclear Data Uncertainty Propagation: Total Monte Carlo vs. Covariances. Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 59(2(3)). 1236–1241. 25 indexed citations

Rochman, D., et al.. (2011). Nuclear data uncertainty propagation: Perturbation vs. Monte Carlo. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 38(5). 942–952. 61 indexed citations

Jaspers, R., M. G. von Hellermann, E. Delabie, et al.. (2008). The CXRS diagnostic for ITER and the CXRS-Pilot Experiment on TEXTOR. AIP conference proceedings. 988. 209–213. 1 indexed citations

Hogenbirk, A.. (2008). An easy way to perform a radiation damage calculation in a complicated geometry. Fusion Engineering and Design. 83(10-12). 1828–1831. 9 indexed citations

Koning, A. J., et al.. (2007). New Nuclear Data Libraries for Lead and Bismuth and Their Impact on Accelerator-Driven Systems Design. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 156(3). 357–390. 25 indexed citations

Marck, S.C. van der, A. Hogenbirk, & M. C. Duijvestijn. (2006). NUCLEAR DATA NEEDS FOR GENERATION IV - LESSONS FROM BENCHMARKS?. 32–37. 1 indexed citations

Hogenbirk, A., et al.. (2006). Neutronic benchmark on the 2400 MW gas-cooled fast reactor design. DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute). 6 indexed citations

Marck, S.C. van der & A. Hogenbirk. (2005). Orange, a new, fast dose engine for radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 115(1-4). 517–521. 1 indexed citations

10.

Duijvestijn, M. C., A. Hogenbirk, & A. J. Koning. (2005). The Role of Fast Neutron-Induced Photon Production Data in the Search for Oil. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 149(3). 277–287. 2 indexed citations

11.

Zee, W. Van der, A. Hogenbirk, & S.C. van der Marck. (2005). ORANGE: a Monte Carlo dose engine for radiotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 50(4). 625–641. 25 indexed citations

12.

Duijvestijn, M. C., A. Hogenbirk, & A. J. Koning. (2002). Sensitivity to Nuclear Data in Oil-Well Logging Applications. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 39(sup2). 1384–1387. 1 indexed citations

13.

Fischer, U., A. Hogenbirk, D. Leichtle, et al.. (2000). Comparison of nuclear irradiation parameters of fusion breeder materials in high flux fission test reactors and a fusion power demonstration reactor. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 280(2). 151–161. 9 indexed citations

14.

Bende, E.E., A. Hogenbirk, J.L. Kloosterman, & H. van Dam. (1999). Analytical Calculation of the Average Dancoff Factor for a Fuel Kernel in a Pebble Bed High-Temperature Reactor. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 133(2). 147–162. 59 indexed citations

15.

Koning, A. J., H. Gruppelaar, & A. Hogenbirk. (1997). The EFF-3.0 evaluation for 56Fe. Fusion Engineering and Design. 37(1). 211–216. 7 indexed citations

16.

Hogenbirk, A.. (1994). Extensive neutronic sensitivity-uncertainty analysis of a fusion reactor shielding blanket. Fusion Engineering and Design. 24(3). 275–286. 3 indexed citations

17.

Hogenbirk, A.. (1991). Energy self-shielding and SED/SAD effects in sensitivity calculations of a NET shielding blanket. Fusion Engineering and Design. 18. 331–336. 4 indexed citations

18.

Hogenbirk, A., H.P. Blok, & M.N. Harakeh. (1991). Inelastic proton scattering from 198Hg, 200Hg, 202Hg and 204Hg at Ermp=28MeV. Nuclear Physics A. 524(2). 251–284. 23 indexed citations

19.

Hogenbirk, A., et al.. (1989). Double folding analysis of elastic and inelastic alpha scattering from 36S using the JLM effective nucleon-nucleon interaction. Physics Letters B. 223(3-4). 282–286. 12 indexed citations

20.

Hogenbirk, A., et al.. (1984). Determination of magnesium isotopic ratios with a proton microprobe in chondrules of the allende meteorite. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 3(1-3). 695–699. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact