G. Imel

461 total citations
38 papers, 222 citations indexed

About

G. Imel is a scholar working on Radiation, Aerospace Engineering and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Imel has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 222 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Radiation, 21 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 8 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in G. Imel's work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (22 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (19 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (7 papers). G. Imel is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear Physics and Applications (22 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (19 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (7 papers). G. Imel collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Switzerland. G. Imel's co-authors include C. Jammes, B. Geslot, Phil Hart, M. Salvatores, Роман Шаповалов, R.C. Singleterry, R. B. Spielman, M. Carta, Todd Urbatsch and A. D’Angelo and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Review of Scientific Instruments and Journal of Nuclear Materials.

In The Last Decade

G. Imel

31 papers receiving 192 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Imel United States 10 147 138 92 25 23 38 222
Michael L Fensin United States 8 145 1.0× 159 1.2× 132 1.4× 30 1.2× 3 0.1× 24 267
A. Hogenbirk Netherlands 10 232 1.6× 182 1.3× 189 2.1× 88 3.5× 3 0.1× 26 341
Robert Ecoffet France 12 52 0.4× 70 0.5× 25 0.3× 32 1.3× 85 3.7× 33 387
James Turner United Kingdom 6 45 0.3× 72 0.5× 72 0.8× 13 0.5× 40 1.7× 16 260
F.C. Difilippo United States 10 185 1.3× 175 1.3× 95 1.0× 54 2.2× 1 0.0× 48 270
S. Jednoróg Poland 11 151 1.0× 247 1.8× 93 1.0× 132 5.3× 7 0.3× 42 318
R.D. Mosteller United States 5 161 1.1× 176 1.3× 137 1.5× 27 1.1× 1 0.0× 26 294
T.A. Parish United States 8 171 1.2× 113 0.8× 123 1.3× 50 2.0× 2 0.1× 39 227
Y. Rugama France 8 241 1.6× 233 1.7× 112 1.2× 47 1.9× 2 0.1× 22 271
V. Vylet United States 10 45 0.3× 137 1.0× 33 0.4× 22 0.9× 3 0.1× 24 195

Countries citing papers authored by G. Imel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Imel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Imel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Imel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Imel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Imel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Imel. The network helps show where G. Imel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Imel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Imel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Imel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Imel. G. Imel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Youinou, Gilles, G. Palmiotti, M. Salvatores, et al.. (2021). Measurements of effective actinides neutron capture cross sections in a cadmium-filtered epithermal neutron spectrum. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 159. 108348–108348.
2.
Imel, G., et al.. (2021). The oscillator technique for cross-section measurements in a sub-critical system. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 167. 108838–108838.
3.
Imel, G., R. T. Kouzes, Azaree T. Lintereur, et al.. (2017). Effects of Correlated and Uncorrelated Gamma Rays on Neutron Multiplicity Counting. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 64(7). 1865–1870. 3 indexed citations
4.
Шаповалов, Роман, R. B. Spielman, & G. Imel. (2017). An oil-free compact X-pinch plasma radiation source: Design and radiation performance. Review of Scientific Instruments. 88(6). 63504–63504. 9 indexed citations
5.
Imel, G., et al.. (2015). Study of the open loop and closed loop oscillator techniques. 1–8. 1 indexed citations
6.
McGrath, C. A., Gilles Youinou, G. Palmiotti, et al.. (2011). MANTRA: An Integral Reactor Physics Experiment to Infer Actinide Capture Cross-Sections from Thorium to Californium with Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 59(2(3)). 1940–1944. 9 indexed citations
7.
Jammes, C., et al.. (2006). Absolute Reactivity Calibration of Accelerator-Driven Systems after RACE-T Experiments. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 4 indexed citations
8.
Carta, M., N. Burgio, A. D’Angelo, et al.. (2006). Electron versus proton accelerator driven sub-critical system performance using TRIGA reactors at power. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 4 indexed citations
9.
Jammes, C., et al.. (2006). A neutron noise-based experiment in a TRIGA reactor. International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology. 2(3). 219–219. 5 indexed citations
10.
Rugama, Y., et al.. (2004). Study of the influence of source type in the kinetics measurements in a subcritical system.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
11.
Carta, M., A. D’Angelo, V. Peluso, et al.. (2004). Reactivity Assessment and Spatial Time-Effects from the MUSE Kinetics Experiments. PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino). 13 indexed citations
12.
Klann, R. T., et al.. (2004). MINERVE reactor characterization in support of the OSMOSE program : spectral indices.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
13.
Garcia, Humberto E., et al.. (2002). Planning and supervision of reactor defueling using discrete event techniques. 2. 81–92. 4 indexed citations
14.
Gillespie, George H., et al.. (1997). Concept design of a transportable high-resolution neutron radiography system. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2867. 343–343. 3 indexed citations
15.
Imel, G. & Phil Hart. (1996). The performance of hafnium and gadolinium self powered neutron detectors in the TREAT reactor. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 111(3-4). 325–336. 11 indexed citations
16.
Imel, G., et al.. (1996). Survey of neutron radiography facilities. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
17.
Imel, G., et al.. (1996). A simulation model of the fuel handling system in a nuclear reactor. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 30(1). 117–135. 12 indexed citations
18.
Imel, G. & Todd Urbatsch. (1992). Beam characterization at the Neutron Radiography Facility (NRAD). University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 5 indexed citations
19.
Imel, G., et al.. (1981). Some experimental tests of Perkins Spread F Theory. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 86(A11). 9204–9210. 4 indexed citations
20.
Imel, G., et al.. (1978). E region coupling effects on the Perkins spread F instability. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 83(A1). 199–202. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026