This map shows the geographic impact of A. F. Valeev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. F. Valeev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. F. Valeev more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. F. Valeev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. F. Valeev. The network helps show where A. F. Valeev may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. F. Valeev
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. F. Valeev.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. F. Valeev based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. F. Valeev. A. F. Valeev is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sholukhova, O., et al.. (2020). Luminous blue variable candidates in M31. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 497(1). 687–697.4 indexed citations
6.
Valeev, A. F., et al.. (2020). LIGO/Virgo S200213t: AT2020ciy/ZTF20aamvqxl, AT2020cjg/ZTF20aamvoxx and AT2020cje/ZTF20aamvtip 10.4m GTC spectroscopy. GCN. 27060. 1.
7.
Lopez‐Cruz, Omar, Lucas M. Macri, A. F. Valeev, et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190814bv: AT2019nqq 10.4m GTC spectroscopy. GRB Coordinates Network. 25419. 1.
8.
Valeev, A. F., Y. D. Hu, A. J. Castro‐Tirado, et al.. (2019). Fermi GBM-190816: ZTF19abqanpy 10.4m GTC spectroscopy. GRB Coordinates Network. 25421. 1.1 indexed citations
9.
Hu, Y. D., A. F. Valeev, В. В. Соколов, et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190814bv: AT2019odc and AT2019omt 10.4m GTC spectroscopy. GRB Coordinates Network. 25588. 1.
10.
Castro‐Tirado, A. J., Yi-Ming Hu, A. F. Valeev, et al.. (2019). GRB 190114C: refined redshift by the 10.4m GTC.. GRB Coordinates Network. 23708. 1.6 indexed citations
11.
Lopez‐Cruz, Omar, Lucas M. Macri, A. F. Valeev, et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190814bv: AT2019nqc and AT2019nqz 10.4m GTC spectroscopy. GRB Coordinates Network. 25571. 1.
Tomov, T., S. Fabrika, E. A. Barsukova, et al.. (2015). M31N 2015-01a - A Luminous Red Nova. ATel. 7150. 1.
14.
Valeev, A. F., et al.. (2013). Spectrum of Var C in M33 in its maximum light. ATel. 5538. 1.1 indexed citations
15.
Shugarov, S. Yu., et al.. (2013). Optical observations of SN 2011fe. Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnaté Pleso. 43. 94.2 indexed citations
16.
Barsukova, E. A., S. Fabrika, V. P. Goranskij, & A. F. Valeev. (2012). The Spectrum of the Optical Transient in NGC 5775. 32(2). 2.1 indexed citations
17.
Goranskij, V. P., Victor Doroshenko, E. A. Barsukova, et al.. (2011). Recent active phase of symbiotic system V694 Mon (MWC 560). The astronomer's telegram. 3149. 1–1.
18.
Barsukova, E. A., A. F. Valeev, O. Sholukhova, et al.. (2010). Spectroscopic confirmation of nova 2010-06d in M31. The astronomer's telegram. 1773(2789). 1–1.1 indexed citations
19.
Barsukova, E. A., A. F. Valeev, O. Sholukhova, et al.. (2009). Spectroscopic confirmation of nova 2009-08e and brightness estimates of nova candidate 2009-08c in M31. ATel. 2213. 1.1 indexed citations
20.
Barsukova, E. A., S. N. Fabrika, O. Sholukhova, et al.. (2008). Nova candidate 2008-09b in M31 galaxy is not a nova. The astronomer's telegram. 1762. 1.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.