Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Formation and evolution of binary and millisecond radio pulsars
Countries citing papers authored by D. Bhattacharya
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Bhattacharya's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Bhattacharya with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Bhattacharya more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Bhattacharya. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Bhattacharya. The network helps show where D. Bhattacharya may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Bhattacharya
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Bhattacharya.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Bhattacharya based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. Bhattacharya. D. Bhattacharya is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gupta, Rahul, S. B. Pandey, Amit Kumar, et al.. (2021). GRB 210204A: observations with the 3.6m Devasthal Optical Telescope and possible jet break. GRB Coordinates Network. 29490. 1.1 indexed citations
Bhalerao, V., D. Bhattacharya, A. R. Rao, & S. Vadawale. (2017). GRB170105A: AstroSat CZTI localisation.. GRB Coordinates Network. 20412. 1.1 indexed citations
Pandey, S. B., D. K. Sahu, L. Resmi, et al.. (2003). Optical observations of the bright long duration peculiar GRB 021004 afterglow. Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India. 31. 19–36.5 indexed citations
12.
Rao, A. Pramesh, C. H. Ishwara‐Chandra, & D. Bhattacharya. (2003). GRB 030329: radio observations at GMRT.. GCN. 2073. 1.1 indexed citations
13.
Tripathi, S. M., D. Bhattacharya, J. Lizarazo, et al.. (2002). The Keck Solar Two gamma-ray telescope, and its observations of the Crab Nebula. AAS. 200.1 indexed citations
14.
Pandey, S. B., R. Sagar, V. Mohan, et al.. (2001). Optical follow-up of GRB afterglows from UPSO Naini Tal. 29. 459–461.2 indexed citations
15.
Sagar, R., S. B. Pandey, V. Mohan, D. Bhattacharya, & A. J. Castro‐Tirado. (2001). GRB 000926 and its optical afterglow : Another possible evidence for non-isotropic emission. 29. 1–13.2 indexed citations
16.
Zych, A. D., et al.. (2000). 10-100 MeV Gamma-Ray Astronomy with GLAST. 5.2 indexed citations
17.
Bhattacharya, D., G. L. Case, David Dixon, et al.. (1996). Tracking, imaging and polarimeter properties of the TIGRE instrument.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 120. 661–664.7 indexed citations
18.
Srinivasan, G., et al.. (1990). A novel mechanism for the decay of neutron star magnetic fields. Current Science. 59(1). 31–38.72 indexed citations
Bhattacharya, D. & G. Srinivasan. (1986). On the implication of the recently discovered 5 millisecond binary pulsar PSR 1855+09. Current Science. 55. 327–330.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.