A. E. Esler

467 citations
21 papers · 379 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

A. E. Esler

21 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

A. E. Esler
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 212
  • Forestry 27
  • Geography, Planning and Development 32
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 112
  • Ecology 117
Replace A. R. Loveless with:
A. R. Loveless United Kingdom
Rhonda K. Loh United States
W. Holzner Austria
Grant Gerrish United States
Lalasia Bialic‐Murphy United States
Íñigo Granzow de la Cerda United States
T. H. Blackstock United Kingdom
Helen B. Correll
Jocelyn Howell Australia
Costantino Bonomi Italy
A. E. Esler relative to A. R. Loveless United Kingdom A. R. Loveless's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
A. R. Loveless · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. E. Esler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. E. Esler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. E. Esler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. E. Esler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. E. Esler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. E. Esler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. E. Esler. The network helps show where A. E. Esler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside A. E. Esler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. E. Esler Line = papers co-authored together A. E. Esler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197449
2 196746
3 198737
4 197324
5 197823
6 198822
7 198721
8 198720
9
An assessment of the point-centred quarter method of plotless sampling in some New Zealand forests.
197020
10 196817
11 198816
12 197515
13 198815
14 197813
15 199113
16
Wild Plants in Auckland
20057
17 19856
18
BOTANICAL FEATURES OF THE MOKOHINAU ISLANDS
19786
19 19804
20 19623

About A. E. Esler

A. E. Esler is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 21 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (11 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (2 papers) and Biological Control of Invasive Species (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (212 citations), Forestry (27 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (32 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (112 citations) and Ecology (117 citations). A. E. Esler has collaborated with scholars based in Azerbaijan, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. B. Tomlinson and A. F. Mark. Their work appears in journals such as New Zealand Journal of Botany, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact