A. Dibet

729 total citations
8 papers, 555 citations indexed

About

A. Dibet is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and Forestry. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Dibet has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 555 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 4 papers in Plant Science and 1 paper in Forestry. Recurrent topics in A. Dibet's work include Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (8 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (4 papers) and Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (1 paper). A. Dibet is often cited by papers focused on Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (8 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (4 papers) and Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (1 paper). A. Dibet collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, Germany and Italy. A. Dibet's co-authors include Erik Steen Jensen, Michele Monti, P. von Fragstein, A. Pristeri, Yves Crozat, Guénaëlle Corre‐Hellou, Henrik Hauggaard‐Nielsen, M. J. Gooding, C. Dahlmann and Per Ambus and has published in prestigious journals such as Field Crops Research, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems and The Journal of Agricultural Science.

In The Last Decade

A. Dibet

7 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Dibet Denmark 6 518 450 218 104 22 8 555
C. Dahlmann Denmark 7 531 1.0× 462 1.0× 223 1.0× 104 1.0× 22 1.0× 11 568
Bjarne Jørnsgaard Denmark 4 414 0.8× 339 0.8× 161 0.7× 73 0.7× 22 1.0× 6 461
Mette Klindt Andersen Denmark 5 359 0.7× 299 0.7× 188 0.9× 67 0.6× 16 0.7× 5 397
Woodrow W. Poland United States 10 466 0.9× 327 0.7× 134 0.6× 126 1.2× 41 1.9× 14 529
Ashim Midya India 5 346 0.7× 305 0.7× 147 0.7× 74 0.7× 13 0.6× 6 402
Mehdi Dahmardeh Iran 9 281 0.5× 241 0.5× 112 0.5× 74 0.7× 21 1.0× 22 362
H.O. Ogindo South Africa 7 298 0.6× 195 0.4× 155 0.7× 95 0.9× 39 1.8× 8 365
H. C. Ezumah Nigeria 12 258 0.5× 246 0.5× 82 0.4× 111 1.1× 42 1.9× 25 407
Dunping Liao China 6 357 0.7× 341 0.8× 137 0.6× 114 1.1× 12 0.5× 6 456
J. F. Ayres Australia 11 263 0.5× 117 0.3× 159 0.7× 31 0.3× 26 1.2× 37 348

Countries citing papers authored by A. Dibet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Dibet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Dibet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Dibet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Dibet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Dibet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Dibet. The network helps show where A. Dibet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Dibet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Dibet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Dibet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Dibet. A. Dibet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Corre‐Hellou, Guénaëlle, A. Dibet, Henrik Hauggaard‐Nielsen, et al.. (2011). The competitive ability of pea–barley intercrops against weeds and the interactions with crop productivity and soil N availability. Field Crops Research. 122(3). 264–272. 158 indexed citations
2.
Hauggaard‐Nielsen, Henrik, M. J. Gooding, Per Ambus, et al.. (2009). Pea–barley intercropping and short-term subsequent crop effects across European organic cropping conditions. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 85(2). 141–155. 46 indexed citations
3.
Hauggaard‐Nielsen, Henrik, M. J. Gooding, Per Ambus, et al.. (2009). Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crops Research. 113(1). 64–71. 251 indexed citations
4.
Gooding, M. J., R. Ruske, Henrik Hauggaard‐Nielsen, et al.. (2007). Intercropping with pulses to concentrate nitrogen and sulphur in wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 145(5). 469–479. 65 indexed citations
5.
Jensen, Erik Steen, Per Ambus, Natalia Bellostas, et al.. (2007). Intercropping of cereals and grain legumes for increased production, weed control, improved product quality and prevention of N-losses in European organic farming systems. CentAUR (University of Reading). 180–181. 27 indexed citations
6.
Hauggaard‐Nielsen, Henrik, Per Ambus, Erik Steen Jensen, et al.. (2007). Intercropping of pea and barley for increased production, weed control, improved product quality and prevention of nitrogen-losses in European organic farming systems. CentAUR (University of Reading). 53–60. 1 indexed citations
7.
Gooding, M. J., Marie Launay, Michele Monti, et al.. (2006). Intercropping of pea and barley for increased production, weed control, improved product quality and prevention of nitrogen-losses in European organic farming systems. 6 indexed citations
8.
Hauggaard‐Nielsen, Henrik, Per Ambus, Nadine Brisson, et al.. (2006). Pea-barley intercrops use nitrogen sources 20-30% more efficiently than the sole crops. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 206–207. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026