H. C. Ezumah
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Soil Science top 10%
- Forestry top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Co-authors
- E. O. LucasF. O. OlasantanN. R. HulugalleD.S.O. OsiruH.J.W. MutsaersR. H. HöwelerDavid J. MidmoreT. A. T. Wahua
- Topics
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (18 papers)Cassava research and cyanide (11 papers)Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
H. C. Ezumah
25 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Agronomy and Crop Science 258
- Plant Science 246
- Soil Science 111
- Forestry 82
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 42
Countries citing papers authored by H. C. Ezumah
This map shows the geographic impact of H. C. Ezumah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. C. Ezumah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. C. Ezumah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. C. Ezumah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. C. Ezumah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. C. Ezumah. The network helps show where H. C. Ezumah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. C. Ezumah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. C. Ezumah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. C. Ezumah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. C. Ezumah. H. C. Ezumah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manipulating canopy structure in cassava intercropped with cowpea and its effects on cowpea insect population densities | 4 |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | Maize (Zea mays) genotypes for intercropping with cassava (Manihot esculenta) in southern Nigeria. 2. Growth morphological changes and yield advantages. | 2 |
| 14 | Maize (Zea mays) genotypes for intercropping with cassava (Manihot esculenta) in southern Nigeria. 1. Yield responses. | 2 |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Effects of melon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.) and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) on the soil moisture and leaf water status of intercropped cassava/maize in Nigeria | 11 |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About H. C. Ezumah
H. C. Ezumah is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Forestry and Plant Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (18 papers), Cassava research and cyanide (11 papers) and Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (258 citations), Forestry (82 citations) and Soil Science (111 citations). H. C. Ezumah has collaborated with scholars based in Nigeria, Taiwan and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include E. O. Lucas, F. O. Olasantan, N. R. Hulugalle, D.S.O. Osiru, H.J.W. Mutsaers, R. H. Höweler, David J. Midmore, T. A. T. Wahua, K. Moody and K. Leuschner. Their work appears in journals such as Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Field Crops Research and Soil and Tillage Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.